Literature DB >> 2495337

Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice.

I McDowell1, C Newell, W Rosser.   

Abstract

In a randomized trial three ways of increasing rates of cervical screening were compared for women attending a family medicine center. Working from computerized medical records, 1,587 women aged 18 to 35 years who were overdue for a screening test were included in the study. In a control group, no formal method was used to encourage patients to attend for screening, and 13.7 percent obtained a test within the trial year. In one intervention group the physician was issued a message identifying those women visiting the center for a routine appointment who were due for screening; 16.1 percent were screened. Sending a letter to patients in a second group yielded a 25.9 percent compliance rate. In a third group the practice nurse called patients on the telephone to advise them to obtain the test, and 20.0 percent complied. Reminders issued to the physician provide a low-cost, opportunistic approach to reach women who happen to visit the practice, but this approach should be supplemented by telephoning or sending a letter to those women who do not attend regularly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2495337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  28 in total

1.  Computer support for genetic advice in primary care.

Authors:  J Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians.

Authors:  J W Sellors
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Do our patients receive maximum benefit from preventive care? A North American perspective.

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Lamberts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 6.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 7.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Prevention and early detection in family medicine: where are we?

Authors:  J W Feightner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.