Literature DB >> 2740510

Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

B K Rimer1, M K Keintz, H B Kessler, P F Engstrom, J R Rosan.   

Abstract

Mammography utilization remains below the level needed to achieve the National Cancer Institute's year-2000 goals for reducing breast cancer mortality by 50%. Previous research has identified both patient and physician barriers. The authors interviewed 600 randomly selected women who were offered a free mammographic examination. Interviews were conducted by professional interviewers using a brief, structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed with chi 2 Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum statistics and discriminant analysis. Noncompliant subjects reported more barriers than compliant subjects. The former were more likely to believe that mammography is unnecessary in the absence of symptoms and that it is inconvenient. In both the bivariate and multivariate analyses, the woman's belief that her doctor believes in regular mammography was an important predictor of compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2740510     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  48 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  Sociocultural correlates of breast cancer knowledge and screening in urban African American women.

Authors:  Susan N Lukwago; Matthew W Kreuter; Cheryl L Holt; Karen Steger-May; Dawn C Bucholtz; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  How sources of health information relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams.

Authors:  H I Meissner; A L Potosky; R Convissor
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-06

4.  Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Jennifer S Ford; William Rakowski; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Annette L Stanton; Tara O Henderson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Ross; A Boyce; P M Gorchov; R McLaughlin; B Rimer; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices?

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Anne M Stoddard; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2007-07-09

8.  Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; J Michael Bowling; Noel T Brewer; Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; Tara S Strigo; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

10.  Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Lynne Pahl; Melinda Begeman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.