Literature DB >> 11556935

Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

D S Tseng1, E Cox, M B Plane, K M Hla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis on existing randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of patient letter reminders on increasing cervical cancer screening using Pap smears.
METHODS: A search was conducted for all relevant published and unpublished studies between the years 1966 and 2000. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled studies that examined populations due for Pap smear screening. The intervention studied was in the form of a reminder letter. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to measure the summary effect of the intervention. A test for homogeneity using the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed.
RESULTS: Ten articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one unpublished study. The test for homogeneity showed evidence of heterogeneity (chi2 = 31, 9 df, P <.001). An analysis for causes of heterogeneity was pursued. Division into subpopulations based on socioeconomic status resolved the heterogeneity (chi2 = 5.2, 8 df, P =.75). The studies evaluating those in lower socioeconomic groups had a smaller response (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.35) than those studies using mixed populations (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.28). The pooled odds ratio showed that patients who received the intervention were significantly more likely to return for screening than those who did not (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient reminders in the form of mailed letters increase the rate of cervical cancer screening. Patient letter reminders have less efficacy in lower socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556935      PMCID: PMC1495254          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008567.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Call and recall for cervical cancer screening in a developing country: a randomised field trial.

Authors:  G Torres-Mejía; J Salmerón-Castro; M M Téllez-Rojo; E C Lazcano-Ponce; S A Juárez-Márquez; I Torres-Torija; L Gil-Abadíe; E Buiatti
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  An inner city cancer prevention clinic. Design, methods, and early results.

Authors:  M Renneker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  M Pierce; S Lundy; A Palanisamy; S Winning; J King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15

4.  A randomized study of cancer screening in a family practice setting using a recall model.

Authors:  G L Clementz; J C Aldag; T T Gladfelter; A M Barclay; H F Brooks
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Improving preventive care at a medical clinic: how can the patient help?

Authors:  D M Becker; E B Gomez; D L Kaiser; A Yoshihasi; R H Hodge
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  A nurse-delivered intervention to reduce barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening in Chicago inner city clinics.

Authors:  D Ansell; L Lacey; S Whitman; E Chen; C Phillips
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Cancer prevention and early detection strategies for reaching underserved urban, low-income black women. Barriers and objectives.

Authors:  L Lacey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Recruitment of women by GPs for pap tests: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J E Pirkis; D Jolley; D R Dunt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice.

Authors:  D R Garr; S M Ornstein; R G Jenkins; L D Zemp
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services.

Authors:  S M Ornstein; D R Garr; R G Jenkins; P F Rust; A Arnon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  18 in total

1.  Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Jong-Eun Lee; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Youngshin Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Papanicolaou tests: does lubricant reduce the quality or adequacy?

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Christina Korownyk; Noah Ivers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A randomized trial of population-based clinical decision support to manage health and resource use for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  David F Lobach; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kevin J Anstrom; Garry M Silvey; Janese M Willis; Fred S Johnson; Rex Edwards; Jessica Simo; Pam Phillips; David R Crosslin; Eric L Eisenstein
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Anna M Napoles; Susan L Stewart; Alvaro Garza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Brian L Sprague; Carrie N Klabunde; Anna N A Tosteson; Asaf Bitton; Jane S Chen; Elisabeth F Beaber; Tracy Onega; Charles D MacLean; Kimberly Harris; Kathleen Howe; Loretta Pearson; Sarah Feldman; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

9.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.