D S Tseng1, E Cox, M B Plane, K M Hla. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. tsengdl@earthlink.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis on existing randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of patient letter reminders on increasing cervical cancer screening using Pap smears. METHODS: A search was conducted for all relevant published and unpublished studies between the years 1966 and 2000. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled studies that examined populations due for Pap smear screening. The intervention studied was in the form of a reminder letter. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to measure the summary effect of the intervention. A test for homogeneity using the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed. RESULTS: Ten articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one unpublished study. The test for homogeneity showed evidence of heterogeneity (chi2 = 31, 9 df, P <.001). An analysis for causes of heterogeneity was pursued. Division into subpopulations based on socioeconomic status resolved the heterogeneity (chi2 = 5.2, 8 df, P =.75). The studies evaluating those in lower socioeconomic groups had a smaller response (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.35) than those studies using mixed populations (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.28). The pooled odds ratio showed that patients who received the intervention were significantly more likely to return for screening than those who did not (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Patient reminders in the form of mailed letters increase the rate of cervical cancer screening. Patient letter reminders have less efficacy in lower socioeconomic groups.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis on existing randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of patient letter reminders on increasing cervical cancer screening using Pap smears. METHODS: A search was conducted for all relevant published and unpublished studies between the years 1966 and 2000. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled studies that examined populations due for Pap smear screening. The intervention studied was in the form of a reminder letter. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to measure the summary effect of the intervention. A test for homogeneity using the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed. RESULTS: Ten articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one unpublished study. The test for homogeneity showed evidence of heterogeneity (chi2 = 31, 9 df, P <.001). An analysis for causes of heterogeneity was pursued. Division into subpopulations based on socioeconomic status resolved the heterogeneity (chi2 = 5.2, 8 df, P =.75). The studies evaluating those in lower socioeconomic groups had a smaller response (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.35) than those studies using mixed populations (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.28). The pooled odds ratio showed that patients who received the intervention were significantly more likely to return for screening than those who did not (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.80). CONCLUSIONS:Patient reminders in the form of mailed letters increase the rate of cervical cancer screening. Patient letter reminders have less efficacy in lower socioeconomic groups.
Authors: G Torres-Mejía; J Salmerón-Castro; M M Téllez-Rojo; E C Lazcano-Ponce; S A Juárez-Márquez; I Torres-Torija; L Gil-Abadíe; E Buiatti Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: David F Lobach; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kevin J Anstrom; Garry M Silvey; Janese M Willis; Fred S Johnson; Rex Edwards; Jessica Simo; Pam Phillips; David R Crosslin; Eric L Eisenstein Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2013-01-13 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Brian L Sprague; Carrie N Klabunde; Anna N A Tosteson; Asaf Bitton; Jane S Chen; Elisabeth F Beaber; Tracy Onega; Charles D MacLean; Kimberly Harris; Kathleen Howe; Loretta Pearson; Sarah Feldman; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-05-11
Authors: Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 5.128