Literature DB >> 20386053

Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Rebecca Anhang Price1, Jane Zapka, Heather Edwards, Stephen H Taplin.   

Abstract

Cancer screening is a process of care consisting of several steps and interfaces. This article reviews what is known about the association between organizational factors and cancer screening rates and examines how organizational strategies can address the steps and interfaces of cancer screening in the context of both intraorganizational and interorganizational processes. We reviewed 79 studies assessing the relationship between organizational factors and cancer screening. Screening rates are largely driven by strategies to 1) limit the number of interfaces across organizational boundaries; 2) recruit patients, promote referrals, and facilitate appointment scheduling; and 3) promote continuous patient care. Optimal screening rates can be achieved when health-care organizations tailor strategies to the steps and interfaces in the cancer screening process that are most critical for their organizations, the providers who work within them, and the patients they serve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386053      PMCID: PMC3731433          DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  119 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery.

Authors:  Richard M Carpiano; Susan A Flocke; Scott H Frank; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Enhancing adherence with mammography through patient letters and physician prompts. A pilot study.

Authors:  S E Landis; S D Hulkower; S Pierson
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1992-11

4.  Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan.

Authors:  N A Davis; M J Lewis; B K Rimer; C M Harvey; J P Koplan
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; J Lee Hargraves; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S K Buehler; W L Parsons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Lawrence Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Julie A Schmittdiel; Thomas Bodenheimer; James C Robinson; Thomas Rundall; Nancy Oswald; Helen Schauffler; Margaret C Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Health plan policies and programs for colorectal cancer screening: a national profile.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Gerald F Riley; Margaret T Mandelson; Paul S Frame; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  49 in total

1.  Foreword.

Authors:  Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 2.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care.

Authors:  Stephen Hunt Taplin; Anne Brown Rodgers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Interfaces across the cancer continuum offer opportunities to improve the process of care.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Steve Clauser; Anne B Rodgers; Erica Breslau; Daniel Rayson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; James L Fisher; Kelly Fleming; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment.

Authors:  G Vaisson; H O Witteman; S Chipenda-Dansokho; M Saragosa; Z Bouck; C A Bravo; L Desveaux; D Llovet; J Presseau; M Taljaard; S Umar; J M Grimshaw; J Tinmouth; N M Ivers
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia Ganz; Eva Grunfeld; Katherine Sterba
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

9.  Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Elisabeth F Beaber; Berta M Geller; Aruna Kamineni; Yingye Zheng; Jennifer S Haas; Chun R Chao; Carolyn M Rutter; Ann G Zauber; Brian L Sprague; Ethan A Halm; Donald L Weaver; Jessica Chubak; V Paul Doria-Rose; Sarah Kobrin; Tracy Onega; Virginia P Quinn; Marilyn M Schapira; Anna N A Tosteson; Douglas A Corley; Celette Sugg Skinner; Mitchell D Schnall; Katrina Armstrong; Cosette M Wheeler; Michael J Silverberg; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Chyke A Doubeni; Dale McLerran; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  White-Black Differences in Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival among Adults Aged 85 Years and Older in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.