Literature DB >> 7482212

Laparoscopic procedure for suspected appendicitis. A prospective study in 283 consecutive patients.

J L Bouillot1, S Salah, F Fernandez, G al-Hajj, N Dehni, J Dhote, A Badawy, J H Alexandre.   

Abstract

Between September 1990 and December 1993, 283 consecutive patients were admitted with clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis. These patients underwent primary laparoscopic approach so that an appendicectomy could be performed by this method. In 49 cases (17.3%), primary laparoscopic examination corrected the preoperative diagnosis and the appendix was left in situ. Appendicectomy was performed in 234 cases (149 women, 85 men) with a mean age of 30 years. Requirement for open surgery occurred in 29 cases. The main cause of unsuccessful procedures was inflammation due to local or generalized peritonitis. Median operative time for a successful procedure was 60 min (range, 25-160). Four postoperative complications (one related to laparoscopic procedure), one case of wound infection, and no mortality resulted. After laparoscopic appendicectomy, the median hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-16). These results suggest that a laparoscopic approach for suspected appendicitis is reliable, allowing abdominal exploration and safe appendicectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7482212     DOI: 10.1007/bf00188450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery. A report on 388 operations.

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination.

Authors:  M W Jones; A G Paterson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; R E Schmieg; J Dix; S B Edge; J B Hanks
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications.

Authors:  P Jess; B Bjerregaard; S Brynitz; J Holst-Christensen; E Kalaja; J Lund-Kristensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  W Richards; D Watson; G Lynch; G W Reed; D Olsen; A Spaw; W Holcomb; M Frexes-Steed; R Goldstein; K Sharp
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-11

7.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Negative findings at appendectomy.

Authors:  W Y Lau; S T Fan; T F Yiu; K W Chu; S H Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis.

Authors:  C M Whitworth; P W Whitworth; J Sanfillipo; H C Polk
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-09

10.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use.

Authors:  Y Nowzaradan; J Westmoreland; C T McCarver; R J Harris
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-10
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  F A Frizelle; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status.

Authors:  M A Memon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Non-traumatic acute abdomen: videolaparoscopic approach.

Authors:  E Fahel; P C Amaral; E M Filho; J E Ettinger; E L Souza; M F Fortes; R S Alcântara; A B Regis; M P Neto; M M Sousa; W G Fogagnoli; A G Cunha; M M Castro; P A Santana
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.