Literature DB >> 7457743

Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications.

P Jess, B Bjerregaard, S Brynitz, J Holst-Christensen, E Kalaja, J Lund-Kristensen.   

Abstract

In a prospective trial comprising 202 patients operated on because of suspicion of acute appendicitis, the diagnostic accuracy was 70 percent based on histologic examination of all removed appendices. The diagnostic accuracy was lowest in women less than 50 years old and in young patients (aged 20 years or less), being about 60 percent in both of these groups. The reasons were gynecologic disorders and uncharacteristic abdominal pains, respectively. Twenty-three of the 142 patients with acute appendicitis had perforation (16 percent). The frequency of perforation was significantly higher in patients more than 50 years old. Postoperative complications were seen in 11 percent of the patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of complications in patients with a normal appendix and no other surgical abdominal disorder and patients with nonperforated appendicitis. However, there was a statistically significant difference between these two groups and the group with perforated appendicitis. In the latter group, postoperative complications occurred in 39 percent of the patients as opposed to 4 percent and 8 percent, respectively, in the former groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7457743     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90164-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  29 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Single-center analysis of appendiceal neoplasms.

Authors:  Takayuki Tajima; Takuma Tajiri; Masaya Mukai; Tomoko Sugiyama; Sayuri Hasegawa; Souichirou Yamamoto; Sotaro Sadahiro; Hideo Shimada; Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Incidence of visualization of the normal appendix on different MRI sequences.

Authors:  Paul Nikolaidis; Nancy Hammond; Jamie Marko; Frank H Miller; Nicholas Papanicolaou; Vahid Yaghmai
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24

4.  Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis.

Authors:  J Golledge; A P Toms; I J Franklin; M W Scriven; R B Galland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Acute and perforated appendicitis: current experience with ultrasound-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  W B Schwerk; B Wichtrup; J Rüschoff; M Rothmund
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.

Authors:  Juliane Liese; Thomas M Halbinger; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Christoph W Strey
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Evaluation of mean platelet volume as a diagnostic biomarker in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Hasan Erdem; Recep Aktimur; Suleyman Cetinkunar; Enver Reyhan; Cihan Gokler; Oktay Irkorucu; Selim Sozen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

8.  The price of better diagnostic accuracy in suspected appendicitis in Jerusalem.

Authors:  P E Slater; R Ben-Dom; M S Rosenbluth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Appendicitis near its centenary.

Authors:  J Berry; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.