Literature DB >> 6476229

Negative findings at appendectomy.

W Y Lau, S T Fan, T F Yiu, K W Chu, S H Wong.   

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted on 107 patients with negative findings at appendectomy. The operation was unnecessary in 94 of the patients. A cause for the symptoms could be found in 43 patients, 32 during operation and 11 later by investigation or by a second operation. Diagnosis remained unclear in 64 patients. There are many diseases that mimic acute appendicitis, and based on the disease entities encountered in this series, the surgeon must examine the abdominal organs carefully if the appendix is normal. The financial loss of negative appendectomy was substantial in our study, and the total early and late complication rate was 14 percent. Patients with negative appendectomy should be regularly followed up to 1 year, since 9.3 percent of patients had a diagnosis made later by investigation, and 12.1 percent had moderate to severe pain on follow-up. Possible means to cut down the negative appendectomy rate without increasing the perforation rate have been suggested herein for further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6476229     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90475-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ercan Inci; Ozgur Kilickesmez; Elif Hocaoglu; Sibel Aydin; Sibel Bayramoglu; Tan Cimilli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training.

Authors:  S E Duff; A R Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The price of better diagnostic accuracy in suspected appendicitis in Jerusalem.

Authors:  P E Slater; R Ben-Dom; M S Rosenbluth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  The correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination.

Authors:  M W Jones; A G Paterson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Tc-99m-HMPAO white blood cell scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical presentation.

Authors:  E B Rypins; D G Evans; W Hinrichs; S L Kipper
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Lahaye; D M J Lambregts; E Mutsaers; B A B Essers; S Breukink; V C Cappendijk; G L Beets; R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; E Trondsen; A Bakka; O K Andersen; S Larsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Acute right lower abdominal pain in women of reproductive age: clinical clues.

Authors:  Sinan Hatipoglu; Filiz Hatipoglu; Ruslan Abdullayev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Visualization of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes at US examination. Clinical significance.

Authors:  C J Sivit; K D Newman; R S Chandra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1993

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.