Literature DB >> 1448750

Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

K N Apelgren1, R G Molnar, J M Kisala.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming increasingly popular as surgeons strive to manage surgical problems via minimally invasive techniques. We reviewed our early experience in 38 patients with laparoscopic appendectomy and compared it to open appendectomies done during the same time period. We found no difference in hospital costs, stay, or wound infection rate. There was a significant difference in OR time: the laparoscopic approach took longer. We conclude that this new approach is not clearly superior to open appendectomy despite theoretical advantages. Newer instruments and further studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1448750     DOI: 10.1007/bf02498864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Technique of laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  P F Leahy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  P J O'Regan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery. A report on 388 operations.

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases.

Authors:  J S Valla; B Limonne; V Valla; P Montupet; N Daoud; A Grinda; Y Chavrier
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  F Bongard; D V Landers; F Lewis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The fate of the negative appendix.

Authors:  F C Chang; H H Hogle; D R Welling
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Which patients with suspected appendicitis should undergo laparoscopy?

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown; J N Thompson; J R Eckersley; G A Ponting; H A Dudley
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-14

8.  Technical progress in pelvic surgery via operative laparoscopy.

Authors:  K Semm; L Mettler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Laparoscopy in patients admitted for acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; A R Rosseland; B Høivik; K Solheim
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1985

10.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use.

Authors:  Y Nowzaradan; J Westmoreland; C T McCarver; R J Harris
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-10
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy--review of the first decade.

Authors:  J P McDermott; T F Gorey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  What is the learning curve for laparoscopic appendectomy?

Authors:  A K Meinke; T Kossuth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

5.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is less expensive than open Belsey Mark IV.

Authors:  W S Laycock; M Oddsdottir; A Franco; K Mansour; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic procedure for suspected appendicitis. A prospective study in 283 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J L Bouillot; S Salah; F Fernandez; G al-Hajj; N Dehni; J Dhote; A Badawy; J H Alexandre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.