Literature DB >> 9422862

Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status.

M A Memon1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA), has failed to gain unequivocal acceptance by the general surgical community as an alternative to open appendicectomy (OA). This is because the early postoperative recovery leading to quicker hospital discharge, which led to the worldwide acceptance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, has not been universally seen with LA. Moreover, in the majority of the published series of LAs, there seems to be a trend towards an increased incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses. However, laparoscopy is superior to the 'watch and wait' policy where the diagnosis of appendicitis is questionable. Furthermore, since a large incision can be avoided by using the LA technique in obese patients, the incidence of postoperative morbidity can be reduced considerably. Nevertheless, before endorsing routine and widespread use of LA, it is essential that this technique is critically evaluated in well-designed, controlled, randomised trials, showing clearly the major benefits to the patient in terms of quicker hospital discharge, reduced postoperative pain, decreased wound infection and early return to full activities. Laparoscopic appendicectomy will never replace all open appendicectomies, but should become an alternative in certain groups of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9422862      PMCID: PMC2502950     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  63 in total

1.  Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  D Mutter; M Vix; A Bui; S Evrard; V Tassetti; J F Breton; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in the 1990's.

Authors:  H I Vargas; J Tolmos; S R Klein; I P Vadis; M J Stamos
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  F A Corso
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep

4.  Experience with laparoscopic and open appendectomies in a surgical residency program.

Authors:  G E Neal; E C McClintic; J S Williams
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1994-08

5.  The integration of laparoscopy into a surgical residency and implications for the training environment.

Authors:  C E Scott-Conner; T J Hall; B L Anglin; F F Muakkassa; G V Poole; A R Thompson; P B Wilton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Kollias; R H Harries; G Otto; D W Hamilton; J S Cox; R M Gallery
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12

7.  Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; E Trondsen; A Bakka; O K Andersen; S Larsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 1,379 cases.

Authors:  A el Ghoneimi; J S Valla; B Limonne; V Valla; P Montupet; Y Chavrier; A Grinda
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  F Bonanni; J Reed; G Hartzell; D Trostle; R Boorse; M Gittleman; A Cole
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic interval appendectomy for periappendicular abscess.

Authors:  A H Mat Sain
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dvir Froylich; Miriam Segal; Adam Weinstein; Kamal Hatib; Eitan Shiloni; David Hazzan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Amanda K Bond; Nikhil Ladwa; Muhammad S Sajid; Mirza K Baig; Parvinderpal Sains
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Staged hernia repair preceded by gastric bypass for the treatment of morbidly obese patients with complex ventral hernias.

Authors:  W L Newcomb; J L Polhill; A Y Chen; T S Kuwada; K S Gersin; S B Getz; K W Kercher; B T Heniford
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit.

Authors:  Krzysztof Pragacz; Marcin Barczyński; Rafał Kuchciński; Andrzej Zieliński; Ireneusz Nawrot
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 1.195

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.