Literature DB >> 2970682

Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis.

C M Whitworth1, P W Whitworth, J Sanfillipo, H C Polk.   

Abstract

Removal of a normal appendix because of suspected appendicitis occurs most frequently in women of reproductive age. We investigated the value of laparoscopy in the diagnostic evaluation for possible appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Fifty-one women were entered in a management protocol, which included diagnostic laparoscopy in instances with atypical features. Twenty patients underwent immediate appendectomy because of history and physical findings classical for appendicitis; 31 women with atypical history and physical findings underwent an initial diagnostic laparoscopy. In the group of patients who underwent immediate appendectomy because of classical presentation, five of the appendices removed were normal. At laparoscopy, appendicitis was diagnosed in five patients, another disease in 15 and no diagnostic abnormality was found in six. Five patients had a normal appendix removed, two because of questionable inflammation and three because of nonvisualization of the appendix. There were no false-negative examination results. Twenty-one patients required no further operative intervention after laparoscopy. The negative appendectomy rate remained unchanged (ten negative appendectomies of 30 performed). Definitive diagnoses of eight instances of pelvic inflammatory disease, six of ruptured ovarian cysts and one instance of ileitis of the small intestine were made earlier than would have been possible without diagnostic laparoscopy in this setting. Diagnostic laparoscopy permits earlier definitive diagnosis and prompt institution of appropriate therapy for disease of the female reproductive tract that simulates appendicitis. Caution is advised, however, when diagnostic laparoscopy is applied more frequently than right lower quadrant exploration in the management of probable appendicitis. The improvement in diagnostic accuracy may be offset by an increased number of negative appendectomies resulting from nonvisualization and false-positive inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2970682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  14 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

2.  Preoperative administration of antibiotics in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Y Murao; S Ueda; S Miyamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.

Authors:  K R Geetha; Annappa Kudva
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liping Dai; Jian Shuai
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Tc-99m-HMPAO white blood cell scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical presentation.

Authors:  E B Rypins; D G Evans; W Hinrichs; S L Kipper
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Minimally invasive surgery. Implications for hospitals, health workers, and patients.

Authors:  H D Banta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-12-11

7.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laparoscopic surgery--anesthetic implications.

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  L C Martin; I Puente; J L Sosa; A Bassin; R Breslaw; M G McKenney; E Ginzburg; D Sleeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R C Ignacio; R Burke; D Spencer; C Bissell; C Dorsainvil; P A Lucha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.