Literature DB >> 1834278

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use.

Y Nowzaradan1, J Westmoreland, C T McCarver, R J Harris.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic evaluation was performed in 43 consecutive patients with right lower abdominal pain and preoperative diagnosis of possible appendicitis. Patients with generalized peritonitis and evidence of perforation of the appendix were not considered for laparoscopy. Visualization was sufficient for making a diagnosis in 97.7% of the cases. In 95%, laparoscopic findings were compatible with the pathology report. Thirty-five patients underwent successful laparoscopic appendectomy with neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications. No further surgery was required; slightly elevated temperatures in 6 patients responded to treatment with antibiotics, and there were no wound infections. Laparoscopic appendectomy is minimally invasive and results in less postoperative pain and morbidity and fewer adhesions and other long-term sequelae than conventional laparotomy. It is associated with superior cosmetic results, a shorter hospital stay, and faster return to normal activities. This experience suggests that if there is no evidence that the appendix is perforated or that generalized peritonitis exists and if qualified physicians and adequate facilities are available, patients presenting with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and possible appendicitis are best evaluated and treated with laparoscopic technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834278     DOI: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg        ISSN: 1052-3901


  18 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.

Authors:  K R Geetha; Annappa Kudva
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  S Olmi; S Magnone; A Bertolini; E Croce
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Use of a hand-held Doppler to avoid abdominal wall vessels in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M S Whiteley; S A Laws; M H Wise
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

7.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic surgery--anesthetic implications.

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A Jain; P D Mercado; K P Grafton; R A Dorazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.