Literature DB >> 7065862

The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS.

H C Diener, W Koch, J Dichgans.   

Abstract

In view of the fact that with psychophysical methods monocular luminance changes may increase the detection rate of pathological interocular-latency differences in MS patients, we studied the influence of stimulus luminance on the detection rate of MS using checkerboard visual evoked potentials. Decrements of stimulus luminance covering a range of three log units were unable to increase the detection rate of VEP. Regression coefficients of the luminance-latency functions did not differ in MS patients and normals. Contrary to the hypothesis tested, the diagnostic significance of VEP decreases with decreasing stimulus intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7065862     DOI: 10.1007/bf00343836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)


  13 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

5.  Follow-up studies of visual potentials in multiple sclerosis evoked by checkerboard and foveal stimulation.

Authors:  H C Diener; H Scheibler
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-09

6.  The Pulfrich spatial frequency phenomenon: a psychophysical method competitive to visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  E R Wist; M Hennerici; J Dichgans
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Kjaer
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.209

8.  Visual pattern evoked responses and blink reflexes in assessment of MS diagnosis. A clinical study of 135 multiple sclerosis/pathol.

Authors:  K Lowitzsch; U Kuhnt; C Sakmann; K Maurer; H C Hopf; D Schott; K Thäter
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1976-07-15       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Diagnostic validity for different components of pattern shift visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W Tackmann; H Strenge; R Barth; A Sojka-Raytscheff
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W B Matthews; D G Small; M Small; E Pountney
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  2 in total

1.  Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness.

Authors:  Zuzana Kubová; Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Jana Chlubnová; Jaromir Sverák
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; K Manny; G Oepen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.