Literature DB >> 1148819

Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

P Asselman, D W Chadwick, D C Marsden.   

Abstract

Averaged visual evoked responses to pattern reversal stimuli have been recorded in 54 control subjects, 51 patients with multiple sclerosis, and 55 patients with other neurological diseases which might involve the visual apparatus. The latency to the peak of the major positive potential in normal subjects under the age of 60 was 104 msec or less (mean 90-5 msec+3 SD). The latency of the VER was prolonged above this value in one or both eyes in 67 per cent of the patients with multiple sclerosis (in 84 per cent of those with definite multiple sclerosis, in 83 per cent of those with probable multiple sclerosis, and in 21 per cent of those with possible multiple sclerosis). The latency of the VER was also prolonged in 25 percent of those with an acute spinal cord lesion of unknown cause; in 46 per cent of those with an isolated brain-stem lesion unknown cause; and in 49 per cent of patients presenting with a progressive spastic paraparesis. The extra delay in latency varied from a few msec to as much as a 100 msec. In patients with multiple sclerosis, a delayed VER was found in the affected eye in all with a previous history of optic neuritis, and in 47 per cent of those with no such history....

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1148819     DOI: 10.1093/brain/98.2.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  76 in total

1.  Normalisation of visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis.

Authors:  Rudy R Hidajat; David H Goode
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Foveal flicker-fusion frequencies: a simple, new apparatus (4F).

Authors:  A Neetens; P Van den Ende
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Retinal origin of VECP delays as revealed by simultaneously recorded ERG to patterned stimuli.

Authors:  R Lorenz; W Heider
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Visual function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B Ashworth; P A Aspinall; J D Mitchell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M H Cuypers; K Dickson; A J Pinckers; J M Thijssen; O R Hommes
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Visual and spinal evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F L Mastaglia; J L Black; D W Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

7.  The rapid assessment of visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Comi; V Martinelli; L Somazzi; A J Wilkins
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Effect of body temperature on visual evoked potential delay and visual perception in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Regan; T J Murray; R Silver
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  The effects of optic disc drusen on the latency of the pattern-reversal checkerboard and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Tomas M Grippo; Isaac Ezon; Fabio N Kanadani; Boonchai Wangsupadilok; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Visual evoked potentials and CSF IgG at different stages of multiple sclerosis: a possible correlation.

Authors:  R Capparelli; D Inzitari; L Amaducci; D Baroncelli; M C Boschi; R Frosini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1983-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.