Literature DB >> 861711

The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

M Hennerici, D Wenzel, H J Freund.   

Abstract

The use of foveal small-size rectangle stimulation to elicit visual evoked responses was compared with VERs elicited by the standard checkerboard pattern. Foveal stimulation achieved a significantly better discrimination of optic nerve lesions in the early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Sources of misdiagnosis due to different neurological disorders are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 861711     DOI: 10.1093/brain/100.1.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  23 in total

1.  Pattern reversal evoked cortical responses in normals. A study of different methods of stimulation and potential reproducibility.

Authors:  O Meienberg; L Kutak; C Smolenski; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Age-related changes in the first order Weiner kernel visual evoked potential.

Authors:  D V Schoon; H Enomoto; M P Harris
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  First-order Wiener kernel visually evoked potentials obtained from multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  D V Schoon; E K Wong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Visual and somatosensory evoked cortical potentials in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W Trojaborg; E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; K Manny; G Oepen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Evaluation of various brain structures in multiple sclerosis with multimodality evoked potentials, blink reflex and nystagmography.

Authors:  W Tackmann; H Strenge; R Barth; A Sojka-Raytscheff
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Versatile pattern-reversal stimulator for measuring visual evoked responses.

Authors:  T J Hughes; J F North; W P Coetzee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

Authors:  M Brigell; D I Kaufman; P Bobak; A Beydoun
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Deliberate alteration of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C T Tan; N M Murray; D Sawyers; T J Leonard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Visual evoked potentials and CSF IgG at different stages of multiple sclerosis: a possible correlation.

Authors:  R Capparelli; D Inzitari; L Amaducci; D Baroncelli; M C Boschi; R Frosini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1983-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.