Literature DB >> 731251

The Pulfrich spatial frequency phenomenon: a psychophysical method competitive to visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

E R Wist, M Hennerici, J Dichgans.   

Abstract

The results of a study in which visual evoked responses (VERs) and a modified Pulfrich method were compared showed that both methods are very effective for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. With VERs, 97% of the multiple sclerosis cases were diagnosed correctly, while the corresponding value for the Pulfrich method was 93%. In contrast to VERs, the Pulfrich method allows only measurement of latency differences between the two visual pathways. This method involves measuring the speed required to cause a shift in the apparent depth location of a large, moving, striped pattern observed with a neutral density filter over one eye. A pathological transmission time was inferred when the patients observed a shift in the depth of the moving pattern either without any filter at all or with a filter whose attentuation was no more than 0.2 log units. A further criterion for pathology was a difference of more than 10% between the two eyes in the retinal speed required for a depth displacement using a 1.5 log unit filter. This test requires about 15 minutes, and can be carried out by a technical assistant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 731251      PMCID: PMC493233          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  8 in total

1.  Use of the Pulfrich pendulum for detecting abnormal delay in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Rushton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Spatial frequency effect on the Pulfrich stereophenomenon.

Authors:  E R Wist; T Brandt; H C Diener; J Dichgans
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Delay in visual perception in unilateral optic atrophy after retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  J R Heron; D Regan; B A Milner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Diagnostic uses of the Pulfrich phenomenon.

Authors:  L Frisen; W F Hoyt; A C Bird; R A Weale
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Measurement of interocular delays with dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  R R Diehl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  The Pulfrich effect in the clinic.

Authors:  Sijie Heng; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; K Manny; G Oepen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS.

Authors:  H C Diener; W Koch; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

Review 5.  Neuroprotection by central nervous system remyelination: Molecular, cellular, and functional considerations.

Authors:  Dylan Verden; Wendy B Macklin
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.433

6.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.