Literature DB >> 6158430

Follow-up studies of visual potentials in multiple sclerosis evoked by checkerboard and foveal stimulation.

H C Diener, H Scheibler.   

Abstract

Visual cortical potentials were evoked by reversal of a checkerboard pattern and a small quadrangular foveal stimulus. Examination of 68 patients with MS showed the highest detection rate for abnormality of VEPs with a combination of both methods. Follow-up studies revealed changes (improvement or impairment) of VEP amplitudes or latencies in nearly half of the patients. Most of the changes were correlated with a history of acute optic neuritis. For the detection of changes the foveal stimulus is preferable to the checkerboard pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6158430     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90391-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  Short-term neurophysiological monitoring in multiple sclerosis bouts. Evaluation of steroid treatment.

Authors:  V Scaioli; C Milanese; A Salmaggi; L LaMantia; A Campi; M Eoli; F Panzica
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-03

2.  Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; K Manny; G Oepen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

Authors:  M Brigell; D I Kaufman; P Bobak; A Beydoun
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS.

Authors:  H C Diener; W Koch; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

5.  Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A W De Weerd
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; Y Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  The reproducibility of binocular pattern reversal visual evoked potentials: a single subject design.

Authors:  Tessa B Mellow; Alki Liasis; Ruth Lyons; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Attention and memory dysfunctions in mild multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Michael Tinnefeld; Friederike H Treitz; Claus G Haase; Hans Wilhelm; Irene Daum; Pedro M Faustmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Effect of time interval, age and disease dissemination.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.849

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.