Literature DB >> 7211154

Visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis.

M Kjaer.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) by checkerboard pattern-reversal stimulation were recorded in 70 subjects aged 10--69 years and in 100 patients with definite, probable or possible multiple sclerosis (MS). Longer latencies and smaller amplitudes of the major positive component were found in male subjects, in old subjects and when the amplifier's band-pass was narrowed. Subjects 10--14 years old had longer latencies and higher amplitudes than mature adults. Based on findings in the normal material, the following three criteria were used in evaluating the recordings from patients: the latency, the side difference in latencies and the ratio of amplitudes between the two sides of the major positive component with various limits for the two sexes and different age groups. The incidence of abnormal recordings was 85% for all the patients, 100% in 50 patients with definite, 70% in 50 patients with probable or possible MS, 73% in patients who had a history of spinal symptoms only, 98% if they had and 74% if they had not experienced optic neuritis. The incidence of abnormal findings increased with increasing duration of symptoms. All patients with visual acuity below 0.67 had abnormal VEPs. The high incidence of abnormal recordings confirmed the value of the test in establishing the diagnosis, and suggested that the use of different normative values for sex and age may increase the diagnostic yield without increasing the number of false positive findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7211154     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1980.tb02998.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  8 in total

1.  Visual Evoked Potentials: Normative Values and Gender Differences.

Authors:  Ruby Sharma; Sandeep Joshi; K D Singh; Avnish Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Visual evoked potentials: phenotypic and genotypic variability.

Authors:  K B Bulayeva; T A Pavlova; G G Guseynov
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Evoked potentials in full-term and premature infants: a comparative study.

Authors:  S Uysal; Y Renda; M Topçu; G Erdem; R Karacan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Reproducibility of the visual evoked potential using a light-emitting diode stimulator.

Authors:  N F Skuse; D Burke; B McKeon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS.

Authors:  H C Diener; W Koch; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

6.  Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; Y Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Visual evoked potentials and CSF IgG at different stages of multiple sclerosis: a possible correlation.

Authors:  R Capparelli; D Inzitari; L Amaducci; D Baroncelli; M C Boschi; R Frosini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1983-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.