Literature DB >> 3973639

Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

W H Ehrenstein, K Manny, G Oepen.   

Abstract

Nineteen patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) and 28 control subjects were foveally stimulated by a small cross formed by rectangular red-light-emitting diodes. By means of crossed polarizers one eye was exposed only to the horizontal bar of the cross, the other to the vertical. Stimulus onset asynchrony ranged from 0 to +/- 300 ms (the horizontal bar preceding or following the vertical). The task was to indicate whether the horizontal or vertical bar had appeared first. Compared with normal subjects, MS patients exhibited much higher time thresholds (ranging from -150 to +130 ms) and had considerable interocular latency differences (up to 29 ms), indicating unilateral or asymmetrical impairment of the visual pathways. The psychophysical latency differences of the patients were compared to monocular latencies and interocular latency differences of the visually evoked cortical potential (VEP) obtained by foveal stimulation. Under the stimulus conditions chosen in this study, the diagnostic value of the psychophysical measurements was equal to or, for McAlpine's classes I and II of definite and probable MS patients, better than that based on VEP recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973639     DOI: 10.1007/bf00313708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  29 in total

1.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Diagnostic uses of the Pulfrich phenomenon.

Authors:  L Frisen; W F Hoyt; A C Bird; R A Weale
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Pathophysiology of demyelinating disease.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  J T Meredith; G G Celesia
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03

5.  A modification of the visual evoked response method involving small luminance decrements for the diagnosis of demyelinating diseases.

Authors:  M Hennerici; E R Wist
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1982

6.  Orientation-specific losses of contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Regan; J A Whitlock; T J Murray; K I Beverley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and the discrimination of Snellen letters in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Regan; J Raymond; A P Ginsburg; T J Murray
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Impaired temporal resolution of vision after acute retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  R J Galvin; D Regan; J R Heron
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  [Visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  J Paty; P Brenot; P Henry; J M Faure
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Subclinical visual field defects in multiple sclerosis. Demonstration and quantification with automated perimetry, and comparison with visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  O Mienberg; J Flammer; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanisms and asymmetries in visual perception of simultaneity and temporal order.

Authors:  L Mitrani; S Shekerdjiiski; N Yakimoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.