Literature DB >> 6866682

Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise.

J Verschuure, M P Brocaar.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6866682     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Interaural alternation, information load, and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  A Wingfield; J L Wheale
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural alternation and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  C Speaks; T T Trooien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech.

Authors:  G L Powers; C Speaks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D Bower
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech intelligibility for interaural alternated speech with and without intervening noise for words and nonsense.

Authors:  E J Kreul
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1971 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Combined effects of interruption and interaural alternation on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  N T Hopkinson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1967 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech communication in very noisy environments.

Authors:  C Cherry; R Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

5.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

7.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

9.  Auditory continuity effects with binaural stimuli.

Authors:  W R Thurlow
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

10.  Effects of spectral alternation on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.