Literature DB >> 17827106

Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

C J Darwin1.   

Abstract

Although most research on the perception of speech has been conducted with speech presented without any competing sounds, we almost always listen to speech against a background of other sounds which we are adept at ignoring. Nevertheless, such additional irrelevant sounds can cause severe problems for speech recognition algorithms and for the hard of hearing as well as posing a challenge to theories of speech perception. A variety of different problems are created by the presence of additional sound sources: detection of features that are partially masked, allocation of detected features to the appropriate sound sources and recognition of sounds on the basis of partial information. The separation of sounds is arousing substantial attention in psychoacoustics and in computer science. An effective solution to the problem of separating sounds would have important practical applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17827106      PMCID: PMC2606793          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  62 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels.

Authors:  B Roberts; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception.

Authors:  D H Whalen; A M Liberman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R B Gardner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Algorithms for separating the speech of interfering talkers: evaluations with voiced sentences, and normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R J Stubbs; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Very rapid adaptation in the guinea pig auditory nerve.

Authors:  G K Yates; D Robertson; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  49 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural basis of processing threatening voices in a crowded auditory world.

Authors:  Martin Mothes-Lasch; Michael P I Becker; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Acoustic and auditory phonetics: the adaptive design of speech sound systems.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.