Literature DB >> 6726490

Effects of the Seidel aberrations on visual target discrimination.

G J Burton, N D Haig.   

Abstract

The effects of Seidel aberrations (primary defocus, spherical aberration, astigmatism, and coma) were simulated on four images using a digital image-processing system. The tolerances of the human visual system to different levels and combinations of the aberration types were determined by a forced-choice discrimination technique. The resulting threshold levels, expressed in units of wavelength, specify the changes in wave-front aberration that can be detected with some defined probability and represent just-noticeable differences (JND's) in image quality. The results are related to the corresponding Strehl intensity ratios and to the equivalent modulation transfer functions. The ultimate aim of the work is to link wave-front distortion to human visual discrimination, in order that meaningful methods of assessing visual image quality may be devised. The present investigation lays the foundations for further work, which, inter alia, will determine the effects of some higher-order aberrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6726490     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.1.000373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Raymond A Applegate; Yue Shi; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance.

Authors:  Julia S Benoit; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Matching convolved images to optically blurred images on the retina.

Authors:  Sara Aissati; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Maria Vinas; Alberto de Castro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.