Literature DB >> 21712375

Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Lucie Sawides1, Pablo de Gracia, Carlos Dorronsoro, Michael Webster, Susana Marcos.   

Abstract

The perceived focus of an image can be strongly biased by prior adaptation to a blurred or sharpened image. We examined whether these adaptation effects can occur for the natural patterns of retinal image blur produced by high-order aberrations (HOAs) in the optics of the eye. Focus judgments were measured for 4 subjects to estimate in a forced choice procedure (sharp/blurred) their neutral point after adaptation to different levels of blur produced by scaled increases or decreases in their HOAs. The optical blur was simulated by convolution of the PSFs from the 4 different HOA patterns, with Zernike coefficients (excluding tilt, defocus, and astigmatism) multiplied by a factor between 0 (diffraction limited) and 2 (double amount of natural blur). Observers viewed the images through an Adaptive Optics system that corrected their aberrations and made settings under neutral adaptation to a gray field or after adapting to 5 different blur levels. All subjects adapted to changes in the level of blur imposed by HOA regardless of which observer's HOA was used to generate the stimuli, with the perceived neutral point proportional to the amount of blur in the adapting image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712375      PMCID: PMC3244874          DOI: 10.1167/11.7.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Blur adaptation in myopes.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfield; Susan E Hong; Sini George
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Neural adjustments to chromatic blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Yoko Mizokami; Leedjia A Svec; Sarah L Elliott
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2006

4.  Influence of adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction on visual acuity at different luminances and contrast polarities.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; Lucie Sawides; Enrique Gambra; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Visual performance after correcting higher order aberrations in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.

Authors:  S Marcos; S Barbero; L Llorente; J Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; N A Brennan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Depth-dependent blur adaptation.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Robert A Jacobs; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Involvement of neural adaptation in the recovery of vision after laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  19 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Adaptive optics without altering visual perception.

Authors:  D E Koenig; N W Hart; H J Hofer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Factors accounting for the 4-year change in acuity in patients between 50 and 80 years.

Authors:  Darren E Koenig; Lan Chi Nguyen; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; John S Werner; Stephen A Burns; William H Merigan; Pablo Artal; David A Atchison; Karen M Hampson; Richard Legras; Linda Lundstrom; Geungyoung Yoon; Joseph Carroll; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Adam M Dubis; Alfredo Dubra; Ann Elsner; Ravi Jonnal; Donald T Miller; Michel Paques; Hannah E Smithson; Laura K Young; Yuhua Zhang; Melanie Campbell; Jennifer Hunter; Andrew Metha; Grazyna Palczewska; Jesse Schallek; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human eye in the visible and near infrared from wavefront sensing, double-pass and psychophysics.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Carlos Dorronsoro; Daniel Cortes; Daniel Pascual; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Induced astigmatism biases the orientation information represented in multivariate electroencephalogram activities.

Authors:  Sangkyu Son; Joonsik Moon; Hyungoo Kang; Yee-Joon Kim; Joonyeol Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.