Literature DB >> 27699113

Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Silvestre Manzanera1, Pablo Artal1.   

Abstract

It is important to know the visual sensitivity to optical blur from both a basic science perspective and a practical point of view. Of particular interest is the sensitivity to blur induced by spherical aberration because it is being used to increase depth of focus as a component of a presbyopic solution. Using a flicker detection-based procedure implemented on an adaptive optics visual simulator, we measured the spherical aberration thresholds that produce just-noticeable differences in perceived image quality. The thresholds were measured for positive and negative values of spherical aberration, for best focus and + 0.5 D and + 1.0 D of defocus. At best focus, the SA thresholds were 0.20 ± 0.01 µm and -0.17 ± 0.03 µm for positive and negative spherical aberration respectively (referred to a 6-mm pupil). These experimental values may be useful in setting spherical aberration permissible levels in different ophthalmic techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (330.4460) Ophthalmic optics and devices; (330.7327) Visual optics, ophthalmic instrumentation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27699113      PMCID: PMC5030025          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.003471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  26 in total

1.  Effects of wavefront aberration on visual instrument performance, and a consequential test technique.

Authors:  N D Haig; G J Burton
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration.

Authors:  Patricia A Piers; Enrique J Fernandez; Silvestre Manzanera; Sverker Norrby; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Noticeable, troublesome and objectionable limits of blur.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Scott W Fisher; Carol A Pedersen; P Gareth Ridall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Limits of spherical blur determined with an adaptive optics mirror.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Huanqing Guo; Scott W Fisher
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Binocular adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Depth of focus and visual acuity with primary and secondary spherical aberration.

Authors:  Fan Yi; D Robert Iskander; Michael Collins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Subjective blur limits for higher order aberrations.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Huanqing Guo
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Silvestre Manzanera; Patricia Piers; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate; James T Schwiegerling; Robert Webb
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Sara Aissati; Mercedes Romero; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Nuria Garzon; Francisco Poyales; Carlos Dorronsoro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Edward Anthony LaVilla; Jim Schwiegerling; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Adaptation to Brightness Perception in Patients Implanted With a Small Aperture.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Kyle Webb; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Visual simulators replicate vision with multifocal lenses.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Sara Aissati; Daniel Pascual; Vyas Akondi; Carlos Dorronsoro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; José F Alfonso Sánchez; Mark Nieradzik; Beatriz Valcárcel; Noemí Burguera; Alexander Kapp
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement.

Authors:  Yin-Hsi Chang; Christy Pu; Ken-Kuo Lin; Jiahn-Shing Lee; Chiun-Ho Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.