Literature DB >> 670549

Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking.

B C Moore.   

Abstract

The level of a masker necessary to mask a probe fixed in frequency and level was determined as a function of masker frequency using a two-interval forced-choice technique. Both simultaneous- and forward- masking techniques were used. Parameters investigated include the level of the probe tone and the frequency of the probe tone. The general form of the psychophysical tuning curves obtained in this way is quite similar to that of single-neurone tuning curves, when low-level probe tones are used. However, the curves obtained to forward masking generally show sharper tips and steeper slopes than those found in simultaneous masking, and they are also generally sharper than neurophysiological tuning curves. For frequencies of the masker close to that of the probe a simultaneous masker was sometimes less effective than a forward masker. The results are discussed in relation to possible lateral suppression effects in simultaneous masking, and in relation to the observer's use of pitch cues in forward masking. It is concluded that neither the simultaneous-masking curves nor the forward-masking curves are likely to give an accurate representation of human neural tuning curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 670549     DOI: 10.1121/1.381752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants.

Authors:  C A Fowler; C T Best; G W McRoberts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

3.  Detection of modulation of a 4-kHz carrier.

Authors:  Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

7.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.