Literature DB >> 21285879

Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Timothy Wilding1, Colette McKay, Richard Baker, Terence Picton, Karolina Kluk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess a novel objective method of measuring response amplitude curves (RACs) using auditory steady state responses in adults.
DESIGN: RACs were recorded in 20 normal-hearing adults. The RACs were measured by recording the changes in the amplitude of the auditory steady state response in the presence of (1) swept frequency narrowband masking noise and (2) fixed narrowband masking noise.
RESULTS: The mean recorded RAC tip frequency for a 2-kHz signal was 2250 Hz for the swept masker method and 2239 Hz for the fixed masker method. The estimated repeatability coefficients, calculated using an assumed mean difference of zero, were 389 Hz for the swept method and 342 Hz for the fixed method.
CONCLUSIONS: These initial results indicate that the swept- and fixed-masking methods appear to be viable and fast ways to record RACs in normal-hearing adults. Further work is needed to further optimize the accuracy of the tip frequency estimation and to establish the normative range of tip frequencies over a wide range of test frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285879      PMCID: PMC3249461          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820a77e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  31 in total

Review 1.  Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  R Galambos; S Makeig; P J Talmachoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

6.  Physiological (waves I and V) and psychophysical tuning curves in human subjects.

Authors:  A J Klein; J H Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Emily Markessis; Luc Poncelet; Cécile Colin; Angélique Coppens; Ingrid Hoonhorst; Hazim Kadhim; Paul Deltenre
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state.

Authors:  E C Levi; R C Folsom; R A Dobie
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  Karolina Kluk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Auditory steady-state response testing in children: evaluation of a new technology.

Authors:  Joseph B Roberson; Carolann O'Rourke; Katrina R Stidham
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.