Literature DB >> 16344475

Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Mario A Ruggero1, Andrei N Temchin.   

Abstract

The responses to sound of auditory-nerve fibers are well known in many animals but are topics of conjecture for humans. Some investigators have claimed that the auditory-nerve fibers of humans are more sharply tuned than are those of various experimental animals. Here we invalidate such claims. First, we show that forward-masking psychophysical tuning curves, which were used as the principal support for those claims, greatly overestimate the sharpness of cochlear tuning in experimental animals and, hence, also probably in humans. Second, we calibrate compound action potential tuning curves against the tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in experimental animals and use compound action potential tuning curves recorded in humans to show that the sharpness of tuning in human cochleae is not exceptional and that it is actually similar to tuning in all mammals and birds for which comparisons are possible. Third, we note that the similarity of frequency of tuning across species with widely diverse cochlear lengths and auditory bandwidths implies that for any given stimulus frequency the "cochlear amplifier" is confined to a highly localized region of the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344475      PMCID: PMC1311742          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509323102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  59 in total

1.  Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  K K Ohlemiller; S M Echteler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections.

Authors:  J Tsuji; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: implications for the spatial distribution of the 'active process'.

Authors:  A R Cody
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Forward masking of the compound action potential: thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak.

Authors:  E M Relkin; R L Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Amanda J Cerka; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A functional map of the pigeon basilar papilla: correlation of the properties of single auditory nerve fibres and their peripheral origin.

Authors:  J W Smolders; D Ding-Pfennigdorff; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; K H Huynh; J Gao; J Zuo; P Dallos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla.

Authors:  A J Niemiec; W A Yost; W P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory nerve of the normal and jaundiced rat. II. Frequency selectivity and two-tone rate suppression.

Authors:  A el Barbary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  57 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

4.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

5.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

9.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.