Literature DB >> 2270188

Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants.

C A Fowler1, C T Best, G W McRoberts.   

Abstract

Phonetic segments are coarticulated in speech. Accordingly, the articulatory and acoustic properties of the speech signal during the time frame traditionally identified with a given phoneme are highly context-sensitive. For example, due to carryover coarticulation, the front tongue-tip position for /1/ results in more fronted tongue-body contact for a /g/ preceded by /1/ than for a /g/ preceded by /r/. Perception by mature listeners shows a complementary sensitivity--when a synthetic /da/-/ga/ continuum is preceded by either /al/ or /ar/, adults hear more /g/s following /l/ rather than /r/. That is, some of the fronting information in the temporal domain of the stop is perceptually attributed to /l/ (Mann, 1980). We replicated this finding and extended it to a signal-detection test of discrimination with adults, using triads of disyllables. Three equidistant items from a /da/-/ga/ continuum were used preceded by /al/ and /ar/. In the identification test, adults had identified item ga5 as "ga,' and dal as "da,' following both /al/ and /ar/, whereas they identified the crucial item d/ga3 predominantly as "ga' after /al/ but as "da' after /ar/. In the discrimination test, they discriminated d/ga3 from da1 preceded by /al/ but not /ar/; compatibly, they discriminated d/ga3 readily from ga5 preceded by /ar/ but poorly preceded by /al/. We obtained similar results with 4-month-old infants. Following habituation to either ald/ga3 or ard/ga3, infants heard either the corresponding ga5 or da1 disyllable. As predicted, the infants discriminated d/ga3 from da1 following /al/ but not /ar/; conversely, they discriminated d/ga3 from ga5 following /ar/ but not /al/. The results suggest that prelinguistic infants disentangle consonant-consonant coarticulatory influences in speech in an adult-like fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2270188      PMCID: PMC2792584          DOI: 10.3758/bf03211602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  34 in total

1.  Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

2.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics.

Authors:  B Delgutte; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vowel information in postvocalic fricative noises.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1983 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

5.  Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.

Authors:  J L Miller; P D Eimas
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-03

6.  Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception.

Authors:  V A Mann; A M Liberman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-09

7.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception.

Authors:  J F Werker; J S Logan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-01

8.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception.

Authors:  C T Best; B Morrongiello; R Robson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-03

9.  The perception of the sound of silence in early infancy.

Authors:  P A Morse; R E Eilers; W J Gavin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1982-02

10.  Infants' discrimination of the duration of a rapid spectrum change in nonspeech signals.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; D B Pisoni; M A Reed; A Fernald; M Myers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006).

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

3.  Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory word identification in dyslexic and normally achieving readers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruno; Franklin R Manis; Patricia Keating; Anne J Sperling; Jonathan Nakamoto; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-03-13

5.  Sensitivity to change in perception of speech.

Authors:  Keith R Kluender; Jeffry A Coady; Michael Kiefte
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià; Grant L McGuire; Amanda Seidl; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07-01

8.  Spectral information in nonspeech contexts influences children's categorization of ambiguous speech sounds.

Authors:  Daniel G Hufnagle; Lori L Holt; Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-07-01

9.  Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Yi-Ping Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Ronald Y Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: the role of auditory categories.

Authors:  Radhika Aravamudhan; Andrew J Lotto; John W Hawks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.