Literature DB >> 6631310

A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

G M Heyman.   

Abstract

This study uses a curve-fitting approach to evaluate the effects of drugs on reinforced responding in rats. The subjects obtained reinforcement according to a series of five different variable-interval schedules (a five-component multiple schedule). For each rat, pimozide, a neuroleptic, decreased response rate, and the decrease was associated with (1) a decrease in the estimated asymptotic response rate and (2) an increase in the rate of reinforcement necessary for half-asymptotic responding. That is, pimozide decreased the proportion of responding maintained by a given rate of reinforcement. In contrast, intermediate doses of amphetamine increased response rate and increased the proportion of responding maintained by a given rate of reinforcement. It was proposed that the response rate asymptote indexes motor capacity, and the rate of reinforcement necessary for half-asymptotic responding indexes reinforcement efficacy; accordingly, pimozide decreased motor capacity and reinforcement strength and amphetamine increased reinforcement strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6631310      PMCID: PMC1347901          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance.

Authors:  T N Tombaugh; J Tombaugh; H Anisman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A note on fitting Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  C Lee Wetherington; T R Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  A Ettenberg; G F Koob; F E Bloom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms.

Authors:  P Zarevics; P E Setler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-06-29       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: III. The effect of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice between food and heroin: effects of morphine, naloxone, and secobarbital.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; R M Wurster; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pimozide, a chemically novel, highly potent and orally long-acting neuroleptic drug. I. The comparative pharmacology of pimozide, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine.

Authors:  P A Janssen; C J Niemegeers; K H Schellekens; A Dresse; F M Lenaerts; A Pinchard; W K Schaper; J M van Nueten; F J Verbruggen
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1968-03

10.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  32 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The sensitivity of response rate to the rate of variable-interval reinforcement for pigeons and rats: a review.

Authors:  Richard L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  Z Zhang; J F Rickard; K Asgari; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Within-session response rates when reinforcement rate is changed within each session.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Patterns of responding within sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Hinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interaction between antidepressants and d-amphetamine on variable-interval performance.

Authors:  K Shah; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  A Towell; R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  DSP4 alters the effect of d-amphetamine on variable-interval performance: analysis in terms of Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  M J Morley; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.