Literature DB >> 312681

Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms.

P Zarevics, P E Setler.   

Abstract

A two-level intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) paradigm was developed in which both rate-independent and dependent measures of ICSS could be obtained simultaneously. Responses at the first lever resulted in stimulation which decreased in magnitude after every fifth response, while responses at the second lever reset the current available. The current at which the reset responses occurred was defined as the 'reward threshold'. In addition, the rate of responding was determined at each current for which the animals responded during this stimulate-reset sequence. Decreased reward following treatment with the neuroleptic pimozide, a specific blocker of dopamine receptors, was demonstrated by an elevated 'reward threshold'. The same effect could be obtained in control animals by making each stimulation less rewarding, i.e., by decreasing the amount of charge per stimulation. Pimozide increased 'reward threshold' without a generalized disruption of response rates. While rates were decreased at low currents they were unchanged at high currents. 'Reward threshold' was decreased following D-amphetamine treatment, and was accompanied by a dose-related decrease in response rates at high to medium current intensities. These data suggest that neuroleptic attenuation of ICSS is due to diminished reward and not to motor deficits. Further, due to the specificity of pimozide, they suggest a direct role for dopamine in the mediation of reward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 312681     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90399-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

Review 1.  Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Chronic low-dose haloperidol effects on self-stimulation rate-intensity functions.

Authors:  M R Lynch; R J Carey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of NPY and the specific Y1 receptor agonist [D-His(26)]-NPY on the deficit in brain reward function and somatic signs associated with nicotine withdrawal in rats.

Authors:  Daria Rylkova; Jeffrey Boissoneault; Shani Isaac; Melissa Prado; Hina P Shah; Adrie W Bruijnzeel
Journal:  Neuropeptides       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.286

4.  Effects of morphine and naloxone on thresholds of ventral tegmental electrical self-stimulation.

Authors:  L van Wolfswinkel; J M van Ree
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Effects of nicotine and d-amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in a shuttle box test in rats.

Authors:  P B Clarke; R Kumar
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Self-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain.

Authors:  B G Hoebel; A P Monaco; L Hernandez; E F Aulisi; B G Stanley; L Lenard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction.

Authors:  A S Killcross; A Dickinson; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Involvement of the GABAergic septo-hippocampal pathway in brain stimulation reward.

Authors:  Germán Vega-Flores; Agnès Gruart; José M Delgado-García
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Authors:  David N Velazquez-Martinez; Benita Lizeth Pacheco-Gomez; Ana Laura Toscano-Zapien; Maria Almudena Lopez-Guzman; Daniel Velazquez-Lopez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.