Literature DB >> 1365648

Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.

G M Heyman1.   

Abstract

This experiment evaluated the effects of methylphenidate on reinforced responding in rats. In each session the subjects (rats) earned reinforcement on seven different variable-interval reinforcement schedules. The average intervals varied from 108 to 3 s and provided reinforcement rates ranging from about 30 to 1100/h. Response rate was a negatively accelerated function of reinforcement rate. Low doses of methylphenidate (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) increased responding maintained by the four leanest schedules, but had little effect on responding maintained by the three densest schedules. In contrast, an 8.0 mg/kg dose increased responding maintained by the three densest schedules and slightly decreased responding maintained by leaner schedules. A quantitative model of reinforced responding, referred to as the matching law or response strength equation, was fitted to the data. This equation has two parameters. On the basis of previous experiments, one was used to measure changes in reinforcement efficacy and the other was used to measure changes in motor performance. The 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg doses changed the reinforcement parameter in the same way as did increases in deprivation and reward magnitude. The 8.0 mg/kg dose changed the motor parameter in the same was as did decreases in lever weight. It was concluded that methylphenidate increases reinforcement efficacy, and that the highest dose changed the topography of responding. The results are discussed in terms of the response strength equation, the rate dependency principle, and the question of how to interpret changes in reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1365648     DOI: 10.1007/bf02245492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  15 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics.

Authors:  G N WILKINSON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics.

Authors:  A L Hamilton; J R Stellar; E B Hart
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-12

7.  Methylphenidate and haloperidol in children. Effects on attention, memory, and activity.

Authors:  J S Werry; M G Aman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1975-06

Review 8.  "Paradoxical" effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs in hyperactive children from the standpoint of behavioural pharmacology.

Authors:  T W Robbins; B J Sahakian
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats.

Authors:  J H Porter; H F Villanueva
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate and morphine on delay-discount functions obtained within sessions.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts; A Patrick McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of methylphenidate and rearing environment on behavioral inhibition in adult male rats.

Authors:  Jade C Hill; Pablo Covarrubias; Joel Terry; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation.

Authors:  N M Petry; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the matching law.

Authors:  L K Murray; S H Kollins
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.