Literature DB >> 16812770

Within-session response rates when reinforcement rate is changed within each session.

F K McSweeney, J N Weatherly, S Swindell.   

Abstract

Three pigeons pecked keys and 5 rats pressed levers for food delivered on variable-interval schedules. During baseline conditions, subjects responded on a variable-interval 40-s schedule throughout the session. During experimental conditions, the programmed rate of reinforcement changed every 10 min in the 50-min sessions. When rats served as subjects, Herrnstein's (1970) hyperbolic equation provided a good description of the relation between rate of responding during a 10-min interval and the rate of reinforcement obtained during that interval. Responding, measured over 10-min blocks, was also approximately equally sensitive to changes in the programmed rate of reinforcement at all times in the session. Herrnstein's equation provided a poorer description of the changes in responding when pigeons served as subjects. Differences in experimental experience or differences in the absolute rates at which subjects responded may have contributed to the differences in results for these different species.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812770      PMCID: PMC1350112          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  R D Spealman; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Variation in Herrnstein's r(o) as a function of alternative reinforcement rate.

Authors:  J D Dougan; F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Within-session changes in key and lever pressing for water during several multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  J J McDowell; H M Wood
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Models of ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  L A Bizo; P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-07

2.  Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: parameters of Herrnstein's (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order.

Authors:  T W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Douglas J Medina; Larry W Hawk; Whitney D Fosco; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.