Literature DB >> 16156139

The sensitivity of response rate to the rate of variable-interval reinforcement for pigeons and rats: a review.

Richard L Shull1.   

Abstract

The relation between the rate of a response (B) and the rate of its reinforcement (R) is well known to be approximately hyperbolic: B = kR/(R + Ro), where k represents the maximum response rate, and Ro indicates the rate of reinforcers that will engender a response rate equal to half its maximum value. A review of data reported in 17 published papers revealed that, under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement, Ro was usually lower when pigeons were the subjects than when rats were the subjects. The value of k, in contrast, did not differ consistently between pigeons and rats. Some accounts interpret Ro as the rate of alternative, unscheduled reinforcers in the situation, expressed in units of the scheduled reinforcer. So interpreted, the difference in Ro implies that less alternative reinforcement (relative to the scheduled reinforcement) typically is available to pigeons in their operant conditioning chambers than it is to rats in theirs. Whether or not that interpretation of Ro is valid, the pigeon-rat difference in Ro ensures that for reinforcer rates above about 10 per hour, response rate will be noticeably less sensitive to changes in reinforcer rate (and presumably to changes in other incentive and motivational operations) with pigeons than with rats as subjects, at least with the experimental conditions typically employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156139      PMCID: PMC1243899          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.03-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration.

Authors:  J Dallery; J J McDowell; J S Lancaster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: the effect of the concentration of sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; P Bevan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reversed effects in closed and open economies.

Authors:  M Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: III. The effect of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Rat toys, reinforcers, and response strength: An examination of the Re parameter in Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  N M Petry; G M Heyman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  6 in total

1.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Interresponse time structures in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew T Bowers; Jade Hill; William L Palya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Obese and lean Zucker rats demonstrate differential sensitivity to rates of food reinforcement in a choice procedure.

Authors:  Jessica L Buckley; Erin B Rasmussen
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-10-06

4.  Characterizing operant hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.

Authors:  Jade C Hill; Katrina Herbst; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.