Literature DB >> 1645100

Patterns of responding within sessions.

F K McSweeney1, J M Hinson.   

Abstract

Rates of responding changed systematically across sessions for rats pressing levers and keys and for pigeons pressing treadles and pecking keys. A bitonic function in which response rates increased and then decreased across sessions was the most common finding, although an increase in responding also occurred alone. The change in response rate was usually large. The function relating responding to time in session had the following general characteristics: It appeared early in training, and further experience moved and reduced its peak; it was flatter for longer sessions; and it was flatter, more symmetrical, and peaked later for lower than for higher rates of reinforcement. Factors related to reinforcement exerted more control over the location of the peak rate of responding and the steepness of the decline in response rates than did factors related to responding. These within-session changes in response rates have fundamental theoretical and methodological implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1645100      PMCID: PMC1322111          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  30 in total

1.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminated bar-press avoidance.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER; H CHORNY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Runway and maze behavior controlled by basomedial forebrain stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  J OLDS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-10

5.  Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain.

Authors:  J OLDS; P MILNER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-12

6.  Variation in Herrnstein's r(o) as a function of alternative reinforcement rate.

Authors:  J D Dougan; F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrete and continuous measures of dimensional stimulus control.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J J Higa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some temporal properties of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Samantha Swindell; Eric S Murphy; Benjamin P Kowal
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects.

Authors:  J D Dougan; J A Kuh; K L Vink
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Measuring resistance to change at the within-session level.

Authors:  François Tonneau; Américo Ríos; Felipe Cabrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcer value may change within experimental sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

6.  Prospective factors contribute little to within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

7.  Temporal control in rats: analysis of nonlocalized effects from short interfood intervals.

Authors:  J J Higa; D Pierson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Representing within-session response rates proportionally and entirely.

Authors:  D W Schaal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Optimal response vigor and choice under non-stationary outcome values.

Authors:  Amir Dezfouli; Bernard W Balleine; Richard Nock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

10.  Acquired appetitive responding to intravenous nicotine reflects a Pavlovian conditioned association.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.