Literature DB >> 6575639

Current distributions in cochlear stimulation.

R C Black, G M Clark, Y C Tong, J F Patrick.   

Abstract

Animal experimental studies have shown length constants of 2-4 mm for bipolar and 8-16 mm for monopolar stimulations. Studies in models using saline-solution-filled tubes have allowed us to examine the radial and longitudinal current distribution for pseudobipolar stimulation and have demonstrated that current localization is the same for bipolar and pseudobipolar stimulation over a 6-10-dB operating range. With coincident pseudobipolar multiple-channel stimulation there was suppression of the current between the stimulus maxima and enhancement at the edges leading to less stimulus interaction. Experiments performed with a pseudobipolar electrode implanted into the human cochlea showed that there was significant spread of current along the ground electrode because the electrode ground impedance was significantly greater than the cochlear tissue impedances. Because this leads to less current returned at each ground electrode, the pseudobipolar array will result in less interaction for coincident stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6575639     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  11 in total

1.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

2.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Heather A Kreft; Elizabeth S Anderson; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Electrically evoked auditory nerve responses in the cochlea with normal outer hair cells.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Menghe Guo; Wenxuan He; Josef M Miller; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2009-12-01

6.  Optical cochlear implants: evaluation of surgical approach and laser parameters in cats.

Authors:  Suhrud M Rajguru; Agnella Izzo Matic; Alan M Robinson; Andrew J Fishman; Laura E Moreno; Allison Bradley; Irena Vujanovic; Joe Breen; Jonathon D Wells; Mark Bendett; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Nerve maintenance and regeneration in the damaged cochlea.

Authors:  Seiji B Shibata; Cameron L Budenz; Sara A Bowling; Bryan E Pfingst; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: effects of acute and chronic deafening.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Rodrigo Bayon; Agnella D Izzo; Margarete Otting; Eul Suh; Sheila Goyal; Jeffrey Hotaling; Joseph T Walsh
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Drug delivery to the inner ear.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; Lisa N Gillespie
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Aditi Agarwal; Xiaodong Tan; Yingyue Xu; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.