Literature DB >> 22034583

Electrically evoked auditory nerve responses in the cochlea with normal outer hair cells.

Tianying Ren1, Menghe Guo, Wenxuan He, Josef M Miller, Alfred L Nuttall.   

Abstract

As hybrid cochlear implant devices are increasingly used for restoring hearing in patients with residual hearing it is important to understand electrically evoked responses in cochleae having functional hair cells. To test the hypothesis that extracochlear electrical stimulation (EES) from sinusoidal current can provoke an auditory nerve response with normal frequency selectivity, the EES-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) was investigated in this study. Brief sinusoidal electrical currents, delivered via a round window electrode, were used to evoke ECAP. The ECAP waveform was observed to be the same as the acoustically evoked CAP (ACAP), except for a shorter latency. The input/output and intensity/latency functions of ACAPs and ECAPs were also similar. The maximum acoustic masking for both ACAP and ECAP occurred near probe frequencies. Since the masked tuning curve of a CAP reflects the frequency selectivity of neural excitation, these data demonstrate a highly specific activation of the auditory nerve, which would result in high degree of frequency selectivity. This frequency selectivity likely results from the cochlear traveling wave caused by electrically stimulated outer hair cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22034583      PMCID: PMC3201821          DOI: 10.1016/s1672-2930(09)50017-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otol        ISSN: 1672-2930


  19 in total

1.  The sources of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Yuan Zou; Jiefu Zheng; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Extracochlear electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions: a model for in vivo assessment of outer hair cell electromotility.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall; J M Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Comparison of electrophonic and auditory-nerve electroneural responses.

Authors:  H S Lusted; F B Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Travelling waves as frequency analysers in the cochlea.

Authors:  G von Békésy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Hair cell mediated responses of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat.

Authors:  K I McAnally; G M Clark; J Syka
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum.

Authors:  A E Hubbard; D C Mountain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Current distributions in cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  R C Black; G M Clark; Y C Tong; J F Patrick
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  1 in total

1.  Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W He; T Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.