Literature DB >> 18321670

Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: effects of acute and chronic deafening.

Claus-Peter Richter1, Rodrigo Bayon, Agnella D Izzo, Margarete Otting, Eul Suh, Sheila Goyal, Jeffrey Hotaling, Joseph T Walsh.   

Abstract

In developing neural prostheses, particular success has been realized with cochlear implants. These devices bypass damaged hair cells in the auditory system and electrically stimulate the auditory nerve directly. In contemporary cochlear implants, however, the injected electric current spreads widely along the scala tympani and across turns. Consequently, stimulation of spatially discrete spiral ganglion cell populations is difficult. In contrast to electrical stimulation, it has been shown that extremely spatially selective stimulation is possible using infrared radiation (e.g. [Izzo, A.D., Su, H.S., Pathria, J., Walsh Jr., J.T., Whitlon, D.S., Richter, C.-P., 2007a. Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 1-7]). Here, we explore the correlation between surviving spiral ganglion cells, following acute and chronic deafness induced by neomycin application into the middle ear, and neural stimulation using optical radiation and electrical current. In vivo experiments were conducted in gerbils. Before the animals were deafened, acoustic thresholds were obtained and neurons were stimulated with optical radiation at various pulse durations, radiation exposures, and pulse repetition rates. In one group of animals, measurements were made immediately after deafening, while the other group was tested at least four weeks after deafening. Deafness was confirmed by measuring acoustically evoked compound action potentials. Optically and electrically evoked compound action potentials and auditory brainstem responses were determined for different radiation exposures and for different electrical current amplitudes, respectively. After completion of the experiments, the animals were euthanized and the cochleae were harvested for histology. Acoustically evoked compound action potential thresholds were elevated by more than 40 dB after neomycin application in acutely deaf and more than 60 dB in chronically deaf animals. Compound action potential thresholds, which were determined with optical radiation pulses, were not significantly elevated in acutely deaf animals. However, in chronically deaf animals optically evoked CAP thresholds were elevated. Changes correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and the optical parameters that were used for stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321670      PMCID: PMC3431617          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal variations.

Authors:  Gulam Emadi; Claus-Peter Richter; Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathon Wells; Chris Kao; Karthik Mariappan; Jeffrey Albea; E Duco Jansen; Peter Konrad; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J H Frijns; S L de Snoo; J H ten Kate
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; D Mortazavi; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear prostheses: stimulation-induced damage.

Authors:  J M Miller; L G Duckert; M A Malone; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis.

Authors:  P A Busby; L A Whitford; P J Blamey; L M Richardson; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R D Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  38 in total

1.  Acoustic events and "optophonic" cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser.

Authors:  Ingo Ulrik Teudt; Hannes Maier; Claus-Peter Richter; Andrej Kral
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Target structures for cochlear infrared neural stimulation.

Authors:  Hunter K Young; Xiaodong Tan; Nan Xia; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.593

4.  [Which colours can we hear?: light stimulation of the hearing system].

Authors:  G I Wenzel; T Lenarz; B Schick
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Pulsed 808-nm infrared laser stimulation of the auditory nerve in guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  Nan Xia; Xiao Y Wu; Xing Wang; Zong X Mou; Man Q Wang; Xin Gu; Xiao L Zheng; Wen S Hou
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Whole cell patch clamp for investigating the mechanisms of infrared neural stimulation.

Authors:  William G A Brown; Karina Needham; Bryony A Nayagam; Paul R Stoddart
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Adult human nasal mesenchymal-like stem cells restore cochlear spiral ganglion neurons after experimental lesion.

Authors:  Esperanza Bas; Thomas R Van De Water; Vicente Lumbreras; Suhrud Rajguru; Garrett Goss; Joshua M Hare; Bradley J Goldstein
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.272

8.  Attenuated infrared neuron stimulation response in cochlea of deaf animals may associate with the degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Bingbin Xie; Chunfu Dai; Huawei Li
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Efferent Inputs Are Required for Normal Function of Vestibular Nerve Afferents.

Authors:  Vishal Raghu; Richard Salvi; Soroush G Sadeghi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effect of shorter pulse duration in cochlear neural activation with an 810-nm near-infrared laser.

Authors:  Jingxuan Wang; Lan Tian; Jianren Lu; Ming Xia; Ying Wei
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.