Literature DB >> 18824076

Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Marion E Frank1, Robert F Lundy, Robert J Contreras.   

Abstract

Insights into the biological basis for mammalian taste quality coding began with electrophysiological recordings from "taste" nerves and this technique continues to produce essential information today. Chorda tympani (geniculate ganglion) neurons, which are particularly involved in taste quality discrimination, are specialists or generalists. Specialists respond to stimuli characterized by a single taste quality as defined by behavioral cross-generalization in conditioned taste tests. Generalists respond to electrolytes that elicit multiple aversive qualities. Na(+)-salt (N) specialists in rodents and sweet-stimulus (S) specialists in multiple orders of mammals are well characterized. Specialists are associated with species' nutritional needs and their activation is known to be malleable by internal physiological conditions and contaminated external caloric sources. S specialists, associated with the heterodimeric G-protein coupled receptor T1R, and N specialists, associated with the epithelial sodium channel ENaC, are consistent with labeled line coding from taste bud to afferent neuron. Yet, S-specialist neurons and behavior are less specific than T1R2-3 in encompassing glutamate and E generalist neurons are much less specific than a candidate, PDK TRP channel, sour receptor in encompassing salts and bitter stimuli. Specialist labeled lines for nutrients and generalist patterns for aversive electrolytes may be transmitting taste information to the brain side by side. However, specific roles of generalists in taste quality coding may be resolved by selecting stimuli and stimulus levels found in natural situations. T2Rs, participating in reflexes via the glossopharynygeal nerve, became highly diversified in mammalian phylogenesis as they evolved to deal with dangerous substances within specific environmental niches. Establishing the information afferent neurons traffic to the brain about natural taste stimuli imbedded in dynamic complex mixtures will ultimately "crack taste codes."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18824076      PMCID: PMC2680288          DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  237 in total

1.  Gustatory nerve impulses in rat, cat and rabbit.

Authors:  C PFAFFMANN
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat.

Authors:  L M BEIDLER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Information processing in mammalian gustatory systems.

Authors:  T P Hettinger; M E Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Thermal stimulation of taste.

Authors:  A Cruz; B G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The many flavors of temporal coding in gustatory cortex.

Authors:  Donald B Katz
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Lack of amiloride sensitivity in SHR and WKY glossopharyngeal taste responses to NaCl.

Authors:  B K Formaker; D L Hill
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-10

7.  Sodium retention and salt appetite following deoxycorticosterone in hamsters.

Authors:  D A Fitts; O O Yang; E S Corp; J B Simpson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-01

8.  Amiloride-insensitive units of the chorda tympani nerve are necessary for normal ammonium chloride detectability in the rat.

Authors:  Laura C Geran; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Inhibition by amiloride of chorda tympani responses evoked by monovalent salts.

Authors:  J G Brand; J H Teeter; W L Silver
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-05-20       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  An analysis of hamster afferent taste nerve response functions.

Authors:  M Frank
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  20 in total

1.  Time and intensity factors in identification of components of odor mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Recognizing Taste: Coding Patterns Along the Neural Axis in Mammals.

Authors:  Kathrin Ohla; Ryusuke Yoshida; Stephen D Roper; Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jonathan D Victor; John D Boughter; Max Fletcher; Donald B Katz; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Amiloride-sensitive and amiloride-insensitive responses to NaCl + acid mixtures in hamster chorda tympani nerve.

Authors:  Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger; Lawrence D Savoy; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Sensory functions for degenerin/epithelial sodium channels (DEG/ENaC).

Authors:  Yehuda Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 6.  The cell biology of taste.

Authors:  Nirupa Chaudhari; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Taste coding after selective inhibition by chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Miao-Fen Wang; Lawrence E Marks; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Salt taste inhibition by cathodal current.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Thirst Increases Chorda Tympani Responses to Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Thomas G Mast; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Response latency to lingual taste stimulation distinguishes neuron types within the geniculate ganglion.

Authors:  Joseph M Breza; Alexandre A Nikonov; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.