Literature DB >> 6389456

A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement.

H J Shammas.   

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted on 180 eyes to evaluate axial length measurements obtained with both contact and immersion techniques. Each eye was measured with the Ocuscan-DBR (contact), the Ocuscan-400 (immersion), and the Kretz 7200 MA (immersion) units. Axial length measurements obtained by the two methods were highly reproducible. Axial length measurements obtained with the contact technique were shorter than measurements obtained with the immersion technique by an average of 0.24 mm.

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6389456     DOI： 10.1016/s0146-2776(84)80044-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc        ISSN： 0146-2776


  13 in total

1.  IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.

Authors:  Rupal H Trivedi; M Edward Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound.

Authors:  Palanyraj Naicker; Siva Sundralingam; Mohammadreza Peyman; Azida Juana; Nor Fadhilah Mohamad; Maung Maung Win; Angela Loo; Visvaraja Subrayan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Computerised intraocular lens calculation: clinical results and predictability.

Authors:  T Olsen; C U Andersen; H J Plesner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Accuracy of routine intraocular lens power calculation in a district general hospital.

Authors:  P T Gregory; R M Esbester; D L Boase
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Primary polypseudophakia for cataract surgery in hypermetropic eyes: refractive results and long term stability of the implants within the capsular bag.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis; A Sciscio; A Ismail; C C Hull; C Liu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.

Authors:  Gabor Nemeth; Attila Nagy; Andras Berta; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Qing-Hua Yang; Bing Chen; Guang-Hua Peng; Zhao-Hui Li; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths.

Authors:  Jia-Kang Wang; Shu-Wen Chang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Clinical evaluation of accommodative intraocular lens implantation in high myopic eyes.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Chun Sung Park; Tae Young Chung; Eui Sang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.