Literature DB >> 2706213

Computerised intraocular lens calculation: clinical results and predictability.

T Olsen1, C U Andersen, H J Plesner.   

Abstract

The predictability of a theoretical, computer-assisted IOL calculation method and of the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff (SRK) method was evaluated from pre- and postoperative biometry in 110 cataractous patients subjected to a routine IOL calculation. With the theoretical method and the preoperative data the refraction was on the average 0.72 D (SD 0.78) more myopic than expected, an error which could be corrected for by (1) substituting the assumed postoperative chamber depth by the actual mean value and (2) adding 0.16 mm to the preoperative axial length. With the postoperative data the error was 0.05 D (SD 0.78) (p greater than 0.05). By the SRK method the refraction was 0.15 D (SD 0.71) and 0.37 D (SD 0.69) more hyperopic than expected with the pre- and the postoperative data respectively. These offset errors could be corrected for in either case by adjusting the assumed A constant in the SRK formula. With appropriate empirical corrections for offset errors the theoretical and the SRK method were similar in accuracy, that is, about 82% of the predictions within +/- 1 D, 99% within +/- 2 D, and 100% within +/- 3 D error. The variation in postoperative refraction after computerised IOL calculation was about one-third of the variation previously seen after implantation of standard power IOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2706213      PMCID: PMC1041696          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.73.3.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  21 in total

1.  Calculation of the optical power of intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S N Fyodorov; M A Galin; A Linksz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-08

2.  Intraocular lens power calculations. A practical evaluation in normal subjects at the Wilmer Institute.

Authors:  K Singh; A Sommer; A D Jensen; J W Payne
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08

3.  [Dioptric value of artificial eye lenses].

Authors:  C D Binkhorst
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  Influence of intraocular lenses on ultrasound axial length measurement: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  H Freudiger; L Artaria; P Niesel
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1984

5.  A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement.

Authors:  H J Shammas
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1984

6.  Comparison of the accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander, and SRK implant power prediction formulas.

Authors:  D Sanders; J Retzlaff; M Kraff; R Kratz; J Gills; R Levine; M Colvard; J Weisel; T Loyd
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1981

7.  Improvement of intraocular lens power calculation using empirical data.

Authors:  D R Sanders; M C Kraff
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1980-07

8.  A new intraocular lens calculation formula.

Authors:  J Retzlaff
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1980-04

9.  Lens power calculation--is it necessary?

Authors:  P Percival
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1983

10.  A new posterior chamber intraocular lens formula for axial myopes.

Authors:  J T Thompson; A E Maumenee; C C Baker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing the accuracy of the SRK formula in the intraocular less power calculation.

Authors:  C Kalogeropoulos; M Aspiotis; M Stefaniotou; K Psilas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; A R Rudnicka; T Lowe; P J Foster; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.908

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.