Literature DB >> 11567964

Primary polypseudophakia for cataract surgery in hypermetropic eyes: refractive results and long term stability of the implants within the capsular bag.

H Eleftheriadis1, A Sciscio, A Ismail, C C Hull, C Liu.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the long term visual and refractive results, and stability and complications of primary polypseudophakia using poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs) for cataract surgery in hypermetropic eyes.
METHODS: Prospective study of 15 short or hypermetropic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification with primary polypseudophakia with two PMMA IOLs implanted within the capsular bag.
RESULTS: The spherical equivalent was reduced from a mean +4.87 (SD 3.00) dioptres (D) to -0.12 (1.40 D), and the deviation from the intended refraction was +0.005 (1.30) D, 23.6 (12.36) months post-implantation. The deviation from intended refraction was not statistically significant (p = 0.989; paired t test). Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/12 or better in all eyes without macular or optic nerve co-morbidity. Interlenticular opacification (ILO) in the form of peripheral Elschnig pearls was seen in four (26.67%) eyes. A new type of ILO in the form of usually pigmented deposits in the central interface developed in five (33.33%) eyes and resulted in the appearance of Newton's rings in three. None of the eyes with ILO had any loss of BCVA or hyperopic shift. Six (40%) eyes were within 1 D from the intended refraction and 14 (93.33%) within 2 D. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of the two intraocular lens calculation formulas used (SRK II and SRK/T).
CONCLUSION: Peripheral Elschnig pearl-type ILO can occur as a late complication of primary in the bag implantation of two PMMA IOLs. A new type of ILO is described. Both types of ILO have not to date resulted in deterioration of visual acuity in our cohort. Use of appropriate biometry techniques and IOL calculation formulas may yield more accurate refractive results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11567964      PMCID: PMC1723740          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.10.1198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  22 in total

1.  Minus-power intraocular lenses to correct refractive errors in myopic pseudophakia.

Authors:  J P Gills; R E Fenzl
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Interlenticular opacification: clinicopathological correlation of a complication of posterior chamber piggyback intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J L Gayton; D J Apple; Q Peng; N Visessook; V Sanders; L Werner; S K Pandey; M Escobar-Gomez; D S Hoddinott; M Van Der Karr
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Interpseudophakos intraocular lens surface opacification as a late complication of piggyback acrylic posterior chamber lens implantation.

Authors:  J K Shugar; S Keeler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Piggyback intraocular lenses.

Authors:  O Findl; R Menapace
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Bivariate analysis of surgically induced regular astigmatism. Mathematical analysis and graphical display.

Authors:  K Naeser; J O Hjortdal
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J T Holladay; J P Gills; J Leidlein; M Cherchio
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Implanting two posterior chamber intraocular lenses in a case of microphthalmos.

Authors:  J L Gayton; V N Sanders
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement.

Authors:  H J Shammas
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1984

9.  Image quality in polypseudophakia for extremely short eyes.

Authors:  C C Hull; C S Liu; A Sciscio
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Piggyback intraocular lens with exchangeable optic.

Authors:  H Mittelviefhaus
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  4 in total

1.  Optical principles, biomechanics, and initial clinical performance of a dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Stephen D McLeod
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

2.  Polypseudophakia for cataract surgery: 10-year follow-up on safety and stability of two poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lenses within the capsular bag.

Authors:  A Gomaa; R M H Lee; C S C Liu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Phacoemulsification with double-in-bag intraocular lens implantation in nanophthalmic eyes with angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahim Saleh; Nesrin Said Madkour; Doaa Maamoun Ashour
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  [Refractive long-term results after piggyback intraocular lens implantation].

Authors:  B Moustafa; H Häberle; C Wirbelauer; D T Pham
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.