Literature DB >> 467535

Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform.

L D Blumenhardt, A M Halliday.   

Abstract

The transverse distribution of scalp-recorded potentials evoked by pattern reversal stimulation was studied in 50 healthy subjects. In most individuals the full-field responses were symmetrical over the occipital scalp, but important variations in distribution, symmetry and waveform were recorded in some cases. Asymmetrical responses were similar for each eye (i.e., they were "uncrossed" or homonymous asymmetries). Full-field peak latencies and amplitudes in the lateral channels were more variable than those at midline electrodes. Half-field responses were markedly asymmetric with well-lateralised components widespread over occipital-parietal scalp. In contrast to the full-field responses, component values measured near the midline were less consistent than those from lateral channels due to waveform distortions in this area ("transitional zone"). Upper field stimulation is particularly likely to produce such midline waveform distortions. Activity recorded from the scalp contralateral to the half-field stimulated shows more inter-individual and inter-hemispheric variation than that recorded from ipsilateral electrodes. Variants in the full-field waveform can be accounted for by relative differences in amplitude and distribution of the ipsilateral and contralateral components from each half field. The algebraic sum of these half-field components does not differ significantly from the components of the separately recorded full-field response. Furthermore, responses from the surviving half-field in patients after total hemispherectomy contain all the ipsilateral and contralateral half-field components seen in healthy subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 467535     DOI: 10.1007/bf00238467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response.

Authors:  G Barett; L Blumhardt; A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The topography of the visual evoked responses to half field stimulation [proceedings].

Authors:  M Beauchamp; W B Matthews; D Small; J F Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Proceedings: Paradoxical reversal of lateralization of the half-field pattern-evoked response with monopolar and bipolar electrode montages.

Authors:  G Barrett; L Blumhardt; A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  A method of measuring the potentials evoked by simultaneous stimulation of different retinal regions.

Authors:  D Regan; R F Cartwright
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-03

6.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique.

Authors:  D Regan; J R Heron
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes.

Authors:  W J Rietveld; W E Tordoir; J R Hagenouw; J A Lubbers; T A Spoor
Journal:  Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl       Date:  1967

9.  Visually evoked cortical potentials in the evaluation of homonymous and bitemporal visual field defects.

Authors:  H G Wildberger; G H Van Lith; R Wijngaarde; G T Mak
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The effect of experimental 'scotomata' on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-field.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-09
  10 in total
  21 in total

1.  Imaging the electrical activity of the brain: ELECTRA.

Authors:  R Grave de Peralta Menendez; S L Gonzalez Andino; S Morand; C M Michel; T Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The human motion VEP as a function of size and eccentricity of the stimulation field.

Authors:  R Müller; E Göpfert; L Schlykowa; D Anke
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Hemi-field pattern visual evoked potentials: a comparison of display and analysis techniques.

Authors:  V L Towle; M Brigell; J P Spire
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP) and Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Patients with Visual Pathway Disorders: A Case Series.

Authors:  Daniah Alshowaeir; Con Yiannikas; Alexander Klistorner
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-08-25

6.  Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the chiasm.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.

Authors:  J M Wild; J M Wood; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Variable effects of pathologic scotomata on wave form of pattern-reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; A Thomas; G Malatesta; M Peresson; T Locatelli; V Martinelli; G Comi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.