Literature DB >> 79476

The effect of experimental 'scotomata' on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-field.

L D Blumhardt, G Barrett, A M Halliday, A Kriss.   

Abstract

The averaged cortical responses to a reversing checkerboard pattern presented monocularly in either left or right visual half-fields have been recorded from the occipital scalp using a transverse chain of widely spaced electrodes referred to a common mid-frontal electrode. The half-field responses showed a consistent asymmetry, the dominant feature of which was a positive wave (P100) that was widespread on the ipsilateral scalp and maximally recorded from the midline and ipsilateral electrodes. This formed part of the triphasic negative-positive-negative complex, the other two components being an N75 and an N145. On the contralateral scalp it was generally possible to record a triphasic complex of opposite polarity, but this was usually of smaller amplitude and its components (P75, N105, P135) showed greater variation in latency and morphology than the ipsilateral components. With progressive occlusion of the pattern stimulus from the central regions of the visual half-field, the ipsilateral positive wave (P100) was increasingly attenuated, while components of the contralateral complex were relatively unaffected, or, in some cases, enhanced. By contrast, reducing the radius of the stimulated area had relatively little effect on the ipsilateral P100, while the contralaterally recorded response was attenuated. These differential effects on the half-field response components are discussed in relation to the anatomy of the central and paracentral cortical representation of the visual field. The implications for the interpretation of evoked potential recordings in patients with field defects are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 79476     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90189-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  20 in total

1.  Retinal origin of VECP delays as revealed by simultaneously recorded ERG to patterned stimuli.

Authors:  R Lorenz; W Heider
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Visual evoked potentials in macular hole.

Authors:  M Kato; T Nakagami; I Watanabe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual evoked potentials in dissociated vertical deviation: a reappraisal.

Authors:  A Kriss; C Timms; J Elston; D Taylor; M Gresty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Value of hyperventilation in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Bednarik; O Novotny
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Visual evoked responses in chronic alcoholics.

Authors:  Y W Chan; J G McLeod; R R Tuck; J C Walsh; P A Feary
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis.

Authors:  L N Johnson; R D Yee; R S Hepler; D A Martin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform.

Authors:  L D Blumenhardt; A M Halliday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Variable effects of pathologic scotomata on wave form of pattern-reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Horizontal scalp distribution of steady-state pattern visual evoked cortical potentials in response to quadrant field stimulation.

Authors:  Y Kakisu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; A Thomas; G Malatesta; M Peresson; T Locatelli; V Martinelli; G Comi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.