Literature DB >> 3168727

Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the chiasm.

J G Flanagan1, G F Harding.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of transient, pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in the detection of early compressive lesions of the chiasm is controversial in the literature. There have been claims that the technique is capable of detecting an abnormality in the absence of any demonstrable visual field loss, and conversely that VEPs are not reliable for the detection of chiasmal lesions even when a bitemporal hemianopsia is clearly recordable. Using nine patients with pituitary adenoma we attempted to quantify the extent of visual field loss and correlate the diagnostic capabilities of topographically recorded potentials following full- and half-field stimulus presentations of various field and check sizes. Differential light thresholds were measured and quantified according to one investigator's graticule for the neural representation of visual space. Results show a strong correlation between the degree of information loss and the diagnostic value of the visual evoked potential. The technique was, however, capable of detecting abnormality in the absence of recordable field loss when large field and check sizes were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3168727     DOI: 10.1007/bf00154408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and other disorders.

Authors:  A L Hume; B R Cant
Journal:  Proc Aust Assoc Neurol       Date:  1976

2.  Perimetric charts in aequivalent projection allowing a planimetric determination of the extension of the visual field.

Authors:  J TEN DOESSCHATE
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1947-05       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways.

Authors:  A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Effects of aging on visual evoked responses.

Authors:  G G Celesia; R F Daly
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1977-07

5.  Source derivation of the visual evoked response to pattern reversal stimulation.

Authors:  R A Clement; J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

6.  Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform.

Authors:  L D Blumenhardt; A M Halliday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with the size of the stimulus field.

Authors:  C Yiannikas; J C Walsh
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

8.  Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions.

Authors:  C G Maitland; M J Aminoff; C Kennard; W F Hoyt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Visual evoked potential diagnosis of field defects in patients with chiasmatic and retrochiasmatic lesions.

Authors:  M Onofrj; I Bodis-Wollner; L Mylin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Correlation of ocular findings and plain skull roentgenogram in pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  H H Cameron; T R Hedges; A Aminlari
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual evoked potential abnormalities in chiasmal lesions.

Authors:  J Brecelj; M Denislic; M Skrbec
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  When do asymmetrical full-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials indicate visual pathway dysfunction in children?

Authors:  Tessa B Mellow; Alki Liasis; Ruth Lyons; Dorothy Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Multifocal visual evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Manju Jayaraman; S Ambika; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Shikha Rajesh Bassi; Priya Ravi; Parveen Sen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in evaluation of optic chiasm decompression.

Authors:  Pavel Poczos; Tomáš Česák; Naďa Jirásková; Markéta Macháčková; Petr Čelakovský; Jaroslav Adamkov; Filip Gabalec; Jiří Soukup; Jan Kremláček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The electrophysiological tests in the early detection of the visual pathway dysfunction in patients with microadenoma.

Authors:  Ewelina Lachowicz; Wojciech Lubiński; Wojciech Gosławski; Elżbieta Andrysiak-Mamos; Agnieszka Kaźmierczyk-Puchalska; Anhelli Syrenicz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.