Literature DB >> 27928359

Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP) and Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Patients with Visual Pathway Disorders: A Case Series.

Daniah Alshowaeir1, Con Yiannikas2, Alexander Klistorner3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PVEP) changes in patients with pathology at various levels of the visual pathway determined by other methods. Six patients with different visual pathway disorders, including vascular ischaemic events and compressive optic neuropathy, were reviewed. All patients were tested with both mfVEP and full-field and half-field PVEPs. Results were assessed in relation to other diagnostic tests such as magnetic resonance imaging, Humphrey visual field test, and optical coherence topography. The cases in this study demonstrate a potential higher sensitivity of mfVEP compared with conventional PVEPs in detecting lesions affecting the peripheral field, horizontal hemifields, and lesions of the post-chiasmal pathway. The limitation of the PVEP in this setting is probably due to phase cancellation and overrepresentation of the macular region. mfVEP provides a more accurate assessment of visual defects when compared with conventional PVEP. The independent assessment of different areas of the visual field improves the detection and localization of lesions and provides an objective topographical map that can be used in clinical practice as an adjunct to other diagnostic tests and to assess disease progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multifocal VEP; visual evoked potential; visual pathway

Year:  2015        PMID: 27928359      PMCID: PMC5122941          DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2015.1074253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  35 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of pituitary tumours in the elderly: a review based on personal experience and evidence of literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Vincenzo Esposito; Manolo Piccirilli; Amato Fratticci; Antonio Santoro; Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.664

3.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Alma Patrizia Tormene
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  M S Bradnam; D M Montgomery; A L Evans; D Keating; E A McClure; B E Damato; R McFadzean
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  D Ristanović; R Hajduković
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06

6.  Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions.

Authors:  A I Klistorner; S L Graham; J Grigg; C Balachandran
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.

Authors:  Ken Watanabe; Kei Shinoda; Itaru Kimura; Yukihiko Mashima; Yoshihisa Oguchi; Hisao Ohde
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Larissa K Grover; Donald C Hood; Quraish Ghadiali; Tomas M Grippo; Adam S Wenick; Vivienne C Greenstein; Myles M Behrens; Jeffrey G Odel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 9.  The multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Jeffrey G Odel; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Multifocal VEP and OCT in optic neuritis: a topographical study of the structure-function relationship.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; H Arvind; T Nguyen; R Garrick; M Paine; S Graham; J O'Day; C Yiannikas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Jonas Graf; Lea Jansen; Jens Ingwersen; Marius Ringelstein; Jens Harmel; Jana Rybak; Robert Kolbe; Laura Rhöse; Lena Gemerzki; John-Ih Lee; Alexander Klistorner; Rainer Guthoff; Hans-Peter Hartung; Orhan Aktas; Philipp Albrecht
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 2.  The electrophysiological assessment of visual function in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Joshua L Barton; Justin Y Garber; Alexander Klistorner; Michael H Barnett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-05-08

3.  Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.

Authors:  Samuel Klistorner; Maryam Eghtedari; Stuart L Graham; Alexander Klistorner
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Structural and functional markers of optic nerve damage in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis.

Authors:  Stephanie Barnes; Yuyi You; Ting Shen; Todd A Hardy; Clare Fraser; Stephen W Reddel; Fabienne Brilot; Sudarshini Ramanathan; Alexandr Klistorner; Con Yiannikas
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2021-12-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.