Literature DB >> 889758

The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

L D Blumhardt, G Barrett, A M Halliday.   

Abstract

The consistency of the major positive component (P100) of the full-field pattern-reversal response provides a clinically valuable and objective means of detecting visual field defects. Its normally symmetrical distribution about the midline of the occipital scalp results from the summation of two highly asymmetric half-field responses, each of which shows the positive component well lateralised with a widespread distribution on the ipsilateral side. Stimulation of each eye in patients with bitemporal and homonymous hemianopias results in two characteristic patterns of asymmetry, named 'crossed' and 'uncrossed' respectively, in which the major positivity is consistently recorded on the side ipsilateral to the preserved half field. Recordings from a patient after occipital lobectomy confirm the authors' previous suggestion that although the major positive component is recorded from the ipsilateral scalp the typical asymmetric half-field response is generated in the contralateral hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 889758      PMCID: PMC1043012          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.61.7.454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  15 in total

1.  VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES IN LESIONS OF THE HIGHER OPTIC PATHWAYS.

Authors:  K A KOOI; A M GUEVENER; B K BAGCHI
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The topography of the visual evoked responses to half field stimulation [proceedings].

Authors:  M Beauchamp; W B Matthews; D Small; J F Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways.

Authors:  A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The average visual response in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  H J Oosterhuis; L Ponsen; E J Jonkman; O Magnus
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07

6.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

7.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man.

Authors:  W F Michael; A M Halliday
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Evoked potentials from the human scalp to visual half-field stimulation.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuli.

Authors:  C Shagass; M Amadeo; R A Roemer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-12
View more
  28 in total

1.  Visual evoked cortical potentials from transient dark and bright stimuli. Selective 'on' and 'off-pathway' testing?

Authors:  E Mutlukan; M Bradnam; D Keating; B E Damato
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Hemi-field pattern visual evoked potentials: a comparison of display and analysis techniques.

Authors:  V L Towle; M Brigell; J P Spire
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity.

Authors:  M L Manning; D C Finlay; S A Dewis; D B Dunlop
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.

Authors:  M Bradnam; D Keating; D Montgomery; A Evans; B Damato; A Cluckie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  When do asymmetrical full-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials indicate visual pathway dysfunction in children?

Authors:  Tessa B Mellow; Alki Liasis; Ruth Lyons; Dorothy Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The origin of pattern reversal short latency visual evoked potential as determined by dynamic topography and the dipole tracing method.

Authors:  S Kawashima; Y Kobayashi; O Nishikiori; A Tabuchi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  M S Bradnam; D M Montgomery; A L Evans; D Keating; E A McClure; B E Damato; R McFadzean
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Effect of simulated octant visual field defects on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-12

10.  Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Diana P Ludlam; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.