Literature DB >> 2641269

Hemi-field pattern visual evoked potentials: a comparison of display and analysis techniques.

V L Towle1, M Brigell, J P Spire.   

Abstract

Three methods for analyzing the spatial organization of visual evoked potentials were compared. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials were obtained from a single subject under three viewing conditions: stimulation of the left, right, and both visual fields. The scalp distribution of the VEP to 1 deg checks was displayed using three recording and analysis techniques: a conventional horizontal occipital array of electrodes, topographic mapping, and 3-dimensional evoked potentials. All three techniques revealed "paradoxical" lateralization of P100. The relative merits of each technique are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2641269     DOI: 10.1007/bf01129604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  28 in total

1.  Objective evaluation of differences in patterns of EEG topographical maps by Mahalanobis distance.

Authors:  J Tatsuno; H Ashida; A Takao
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-03

2.  Facts and artifacts in brain electrical activity mapping.

Authors:  K L Coburn; M A Moreno
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Spatial display and parameter computation of the human epileptic spike focus by computer.

Authors:  J A Harris; R G Bickford
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03

4.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Amplitude difference between pattern-evoked potentials after left and right hemifield stimulation in normal subjects.

Authors:  Y Kuroiwa; G G Celesia; H Tohgi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

7.  Vector analysis of auditory brain stem responses (BSR) in human beings.

Authors:  T Ino; K Mizoi
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1980

8.  Localization of visually evoked cortical activity in humans.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Spatio-temporal modelling of early auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  M Scherg
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1984

10.  The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli.

Authors:  R Simson; H G Vaughan; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in electrical and hemodynamic responses during hemifield visual stimulation with graded contrasts.

Authors:  Juanning Si; Xin Zhang; Yujin Zhang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Patrícia de Freitas Dotto; Adriana Berezovsky; Andrea Maria Cappellano; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Paula Yuri Sacai; Frederico Adolfo B Silva; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Daniel Martins Rocha; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.