Literature DB >> 3956363

Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.

J G Flanagan, G F Harding.   

Abstract

There has been much recent conjecture over the apparent source location of the visually evoked potential, particularly in considering the lateralization found in halffield pattern reversal stimulation. This paper presents an alternative by directly identifying the sinks or sources present in the scalp current flow as these correspond to the maximal current flow into or out of the cortex (Nunez, 1981). Hjorth (1975) introduced a practical procedure for source derivation which has proved useful in the interpretation of the electroencephalogram (Wallin and Stalberg, 1980). We have applied source derivaton to cortical evoked potentials and present results obtained from right and left half-field stimulation, (Clement, Flanagan and Harding, 1985) and upper and lower field stimulation in normal subjects and patients with visual deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3956363     DOI: 10.1007/bf00140552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Evoked potentials from the human scalp to visual half-field stimulation.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; D Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Source density analysis of scalp potentials during evaluated action. I. Coronal distribution.

Authors:  D M MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Intracerebral and scalp fields evoked by hemiretinal checkerboard reversal, and modeling of their dipole generators.

Authors:  D Lehmann; T M Darcey; W Skrandies
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1982

6.  Dipole localization of average and single visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  R W Sencaj; J I Aunon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A method for localization of sources of human cerebral potentials evoked by sensory stimuli.

Authors:  R D Sidman; V Giambalvo; T Allison; P Bergey
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1978-06

8.  Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain.

Authors:  R N Kavanagh; T M Darcey; D Lehmann; D H Fender
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Checkerboard-evoked potentials: topography and latency for onset, offset, and reversal.

Authors:  W Skrandies; M Richter; D Lehmann
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations.

Authors:  B Hjorth
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.

Authors:  G Harding; B Janday; R Armstrong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Results with multichannel topographical bipolar recordings of the visual evoked potential in normals and amblyopes.

Authors:  V Schippers; J Silny; G Rau; C Teping
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Different scalp localization of pattern onset and reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children.

Authors:  Alison M Mackay; Ruth Hamilton; Michael S Bradnam
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.