Literature DB >> 4584578

Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.

W G Presswood, L R Brown.   

Abstract

Tests of two leading brands of membrane filters used for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria showed that Gelman GN-6 filters recovered statistically more colonies of bacteria than did Millipore HAWG 047SO filters from pure cultures incubated at either 35 C (the optimal growth temperature) or 44.5 C (the standard temperature for the fecal coliform test). Standard membrane filter procedures with M-FC broth base were used to enumerate the organisms. Densities of colonies incubated on Gelman filters at 44.5 C averaged 2.3 times greater than those on Millipore filters. Plate counts of the bacteria at both temperatures indicated that incubation at 44.5 C did not inhibit propagation of fecal coliform bacteria. For the pour plates, M-FC broth base plus 1.5% agar was used. This modified medium compared favorably to plate count agar for enumerating Escherichia coli. At 35 and 44.5 C, colony counts on Gelman filters agreed closely with plate counts prepared concurrently, but Millipore counts were consistently lower than plate counts, especially at 44.5 C. Comparative analyses of river water for fecal coliform bacteria by the membrane filter technique gave results comparable to those for the pure cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4584578      PMCID: PMC379785          DOI: 10.1128/am.26.3.332-336.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  13 in total

1.  Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.

Authors:  K J Sladek; R V Suslavich; B I Sohn; F W Dawson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; D A Schiemann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

3.  Enumeration of high numbers of bacteria using hydrophobic grid-membrane filters.

Authors:  A N Sharpe; G L Michaud
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

4.  Evaluation of coli-count samplers for possible use in standard couting of total and fecal coliforms in recreational waters.

Authors:  M Hedberg; D A Connor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

5.  New screening test to determine the acceptability of 0.45-micron membrane filters for analysis of water.

Authors:  K P Brenner; C C Rankin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

Authors:  J H Standridge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of recovery methods to detect coliforms in water.

Authors:  G K Bissonnette; J J Jezeski; G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

Authors:  R S Tobin; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

Authors:  D J Schaeffer; M C Long; K G Janardan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

10.  Fecal indicator bacteria persistence under natural conditions in an ice-covered river.

Authors:  C V Davenport; E B Sparrow; R C Gordon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.