Literature DB >> 1106318

Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.

M H Brodsky, D A Schiemann.   

Abstract

Four brands of membrane filters were examined for total and fecal coliform recovery performance by two experimental approaches. Using diluted EC broth cultures of water samples, Johns-Manville filters were superior to Sartorius filters for fecal coliform but equivalent for total coliform recovery. Using river water samples, Johns-Manville filters were superior to Sartorius filters for total coliform but equivalent for fecal coliform recovery. No differences were observed between Johns-Manville and Millipore or Millipore and Sartorius filters for total or fecal coliform recoveries using either approach, nor was any difference observed between Millipore and Gelman filters for fecal coliform recovery from river water samples. These results indicate that the source of the coliform bacteria has an important influence on the conclusions of membrane filter evaluation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1106318      PMCID: PMC187262          DOI: 10.1128/am.30.5.727-730.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  4 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

Authors:  D J Schaeffer; M C Long; K G Janardan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

2.  Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  W G Presswood; L R Brown
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09

3.  Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism.

Authors:  J B Hufham
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04

4.  Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.

Authors:  B J Dutka; M J Jackson; J B Bell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-09
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  New screening test to determine the acceptability of 0.45-micron membrane filters for analysis of water.

Authors:  K P Brenner; C C Rankin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

Authors:  R S Tobin; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  R S Tobin; P Lomax; D J Kushner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improved bacterial recovery by membrane filters in the presence of food debris.

Authors:  J M Farber; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.