Literature DB >> 329763

Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

R S Tobin, B J Dutka.   

Abstract

A comparative study was made of nine commonly used membrane filters from five manufacturers, all recommended for enumeration of coliform bacteria. Bacterial recoveries and flow rates were examined from three types of water and were found to correlate with the surface pore structure determined by scanning electron microscopy. The sorption of metals was also determined. The results of these studies indicate that the five best membranes for fecal coliform recovery could be placed in two groups: Millipore HC and Gelman, followed by Johns-Manville SG and AG and Sartorius 13806.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 329763      PMCID: PMC242591          DOI: 10.1128/aem.34.1.69-79.1977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  B L Green; E Clausen; W Litsky
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.

Authors:  K J Sladek; R V Suslavich; B I Sohn; F W Dawson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

3.  Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; D A Schiemann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

4.  Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

Authors:  J H Standridge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

Authors:  D J Schaeffer; M C Long; K G Janardan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

6.  Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  W G Presswood; L R Brown
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09

7.  Evaluation of millipore HA and HC membrane filters for the enumeration of indicator bacteria.

Authors:  S D Lin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.

Authors:  B J Dutka; M J Jackson; J B Bell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-09
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  R S Tobin; P Lomax; D J Kushner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Membrane filtration of food suspensions.

Authors:  A N Sharpe; P I Peterkin; I Dudas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Membrane filtration of dairy products for microbiological analysis.

Authors:  P I Peterkin; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Injury by heavy metals in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Cenci; G Morozzi; G Caldini
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria.

Authors:  G A McFeters; S C Cameron; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Improved bacterial recovery by membrane filters in the presence of food debris.

Authors:  J M Farber; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of m-Endo LES, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water.

Authors:  W O Grabow; M du Preez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Adherence of bacteria, yeast, blood cells, and latex spheres to large-porosity membrane filters.

Authors:  C H Zierdt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  In situ and laboratory studies of bacterial survival using a microporous membrane sandwich.

Authors:  C Granai; R E Sjogren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.

Authors:  W O Grabow; C A Hilner; P Coubrough
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.